Practical example of this would be the trade in L046.
thats not a very good example. its not endangered yet and the only reason why it will be extinct in the wild is they are building dams that will destroy their habitat.
a lot of aquariums work with members of the hobby to help keep species from going extinct. there are many others they hoping to get into the trade or in the hands of breeders since they will become extinct in the wild very soon.
As you well know government has several regulations and limitations on the animals we keep? my question is why are they doing this?
some of it is trying to keep them in the wild and out of peoples tanks. other is just misinformation on their part or lack of even know what they are signing. a bill such as save our natural fish bill but in there ends up be a list of fish being banned as well yet they think hey that sounds right and sign with out reading or understanding what they are agreeing too. they find banning something is a easy fix to a problem which i person dont think really works for the most part. 2 examples.... piranhas banned in cali
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/for/2552407226.html the person buying the illegal fish i assume more likely dump it vs risk getting in trouble. they could do a permit system allowing responsible hobbyist to apply. many of the fish that are banned would no way survive in the wild. case in point 2 maine has a large list of fish that cant be sold even though they have zero chance of living though the winter. i believe even like crystal red shrimp are illegal in manie.
many of you will say that the government wants to protect our natural resources
that is the goal but banning doesnt work. education is the answer.
can you explain a way that the guppy, the goldfish, or the betta could possibly become completely extinct?
they wont be. the laws are not about world wild care its about usa care.
Can you explain how the asian arowanna, the devil's hole pupfish, or the galaxy danio could possibly become extinct if they were allowed to be kept (and bred) by hobbyists?
dont know about the pupfish but the average or even the more advanced hobbyst wont be breeding the asian arows. its the farms that would do that. like i said before a lot of people who work in the wild making sure things dont get extinct work at getting the fish into the hands of breeders and the fish farms. i remember one of dr Paul Loiselle talks. he said how i believe it was the cherry barb was almost extinct until it got into the hands of the fish farms and now there more in the world then there ever been. just have to find its way into the right hands.
bringing endangered species into the hobby should be something that is supported by those who wish to save a species
there is a large part of the hobby who just keep fish thats fine. dont care about being endangered or looking to breed anything. there all ready a lot of this happening. i dont think its the gov place for it though. aquariums and colleges working together with breeders and programs such as the aca is the key.
captive breeding programs need to be implemented by hobbyists
they already are.