SeaClone

boxcarskater90

boxcarskater90

AC Members
Oct 11, 2007
52
0
0
Okay Okay I know every where I look on this website everyone says the seaclone is horrible. I won this protein skimmer in a raffle at LFS. It is the Seaclone 100. I read on here that there is ways to mod it or make it better. Right now it seems to be working fine, other than its a little nosiey. I got this for free so I want to see if it will work for me....if not Ill have to buy one, but since it was free I thought I would give it a shot. So any tips ideas mods or advice, I would apperciate it much.:idea:
 
just throw a wooden air stone (connected to an air pump of course) in the reaction chamber of the skimmer. it'll help but ive had a seaclone and they seem to only work for the first month that you have them. then they kinda just stop working. just my experience, hope it helped!
 
i've got one, too. it actually works better now, after about 6 mos., than when new. i'm not real impressed with it, but i know that if you put a better air valve on it, it works much better. i don't have the link, but somewhere i bookmarked an article called "sea clone modifications" by clinton yiu. i think i actually found the link the " reef central site." i haven't tried the mods yet, though they look simple.
 
mine seems to be fine now...it is just extreamly noisey. I will look into the airstone idea....what is that for???
 
i can't attach pdf files so i will copy and paste it......i plan on doing some kind of mod to mine.....i have a seaclone 100 which i bought before i read about them and one that came with a tank set up i bought......they both seem to work okay.....i know one of them has a lot more skimmate than the other but the bio load is bigger on one tank.......what about a regular air stone in the reaction chamber......will that work?
 
SeaClone Modifications
by Clinton Yiu
Introduction
The Seaclone is not that bad of a skimmer. Considering its price and power consumption it is
one of the better low-end models. Many reefers say it is useless and doesn't skim (if at all) as
much as their Turboflotor,etc but that's like comparing apples to oranges. This is an unfair
comparison since the Seaclone only uses a Maxi-Jet 1000 for both water flow and bubble
generation and is about 1/4 the cost.
If you are reading this then you probably have a Seaclone already. So I won't elaborate on its
description or the nature of its design (counter current). In an effort to avoid any confusion the
terminology used in this write-up is as follows. The inner tube is the 1" diameter riser at the
centre of the skimmer. The intermediate tube is the 2-3/4" +/- diameter tube that separates the
reaction chamber from the outflow channel.
The Basic Tasks of Modification
There are three basic tasks that can individually enhance a Seaclone's performance.
1) Replace the stock air flow adjustment end cap and replace with a air adjustment valve.
2) Reduce the inner most riser tube's length to approximately 2-1/2" to 3" in length.
This can be accomplished by pulling out the inner tube with a pair of needle nose pliers after
you have gently rock the tube back and forth with your fingers. It should come loose without
breaking. Take your time with this task because if you do break the inner tube you will have a
very tough time clearing the base of broken acrylic. Unless you have very small hands that can
fit in the skimmer.
3) Seal the base of the collection cup to the top of the intermediate tube. The simplest
method I came up with is by cutting an O-ring out of a sheet of compressible non-porous foam.
The best type of material is similar to the large foam O-rings you find from an old Magnum
canister filter. This should give you an idea of what is needed. I trimmed the tip off a foam
gasket that is normally used to seal a reservoir tank to a toilet.
The Purpose of Each Task
1) The air flow adjustment endcap that the Seaclone comes with is the item that frustrates
many hobbyists. It is not meant to be used the way it needs to be and is obviously a cost saving
measure by the manufacturer. Opened too wide the Maxi-Jet generates too much bubbles and
inadequate flowrate. There is also a point where too much air will decrease the suction of the
water pump hence reducing both the water flow rate and bubble generation to nearly zero. Don't
open the cap enough and the water flow becomes too high and flushes the bubbles down to the
outflow channel and into your display tank. Hence a good air adjustment valve is needed to
control the bubble generation and water flow rate.
2) Reaction time is one of the main factors in protein skimming and the stock Seaclone has
very little of this. The inner tube extends too high and is too narrow in diameter offering very
little bubble and water mixing and contact time. Cutting this inner tube down in length
effectively utililizes the volume of the intermediate tube as a reaction chamber. The intermediate
tube has a much larger diameter hence cross sectional area and inversely the flow rate. The flow
of water through the reaction chamber is greatly reduced, allowing for a greater contact time.
The Modified SeaClone in action:
3) A portion of the air from the bubble generation does not exit the skimmer via the foam
collection cup. Sealing the base of the cup to the top flange of the intermediate tube forces all
the air to flow through the cup. This increased air flow helps push the foam up to be collected.
Another Modification Worth Considering
4) Reduce the height of the riser tube in the collection cup. The skimmate that the Seaclone
generates is quite dark when compared to that produced by high-end skimmers. The main reason
for this is the difference in height between the water column/foam interface and the top of the
skimmate overflow tube in the collection cup. This distance is far too much for the foam to
travel for this low power skimmer. The Maxi-Jet simply doesn't generate enough foam and air to
blow the skimmate up such a tall dry column. I haven't figured out a way to cut this inner tube
with minimal effort. The only solution is with the use of a hand held rotary tool (Dremel) but
this may generate too much heat and bind the blade as the acrylic melts. The quality of the cut is
also questionable since there is no guide available to make such a cut.
The Results
I have claimed this modification to be worthwhile based on a comparison of my current
observation of the modified Seaclone's performance and that of the stock Seaclone from my
recollection. I really don't have any prove that the modifications work. Fortunately (and many
thanks to) Larry has acquired two Seaclone skimmers and is currently putting them to the test.
He is running a modified and a stock Seaclone simultaneously on one of his reef tanks. His
initial response has been good but the final verdict has yet to be given.
Clint Y.
Larry's notes: As you can see by the pictures, cutting off the inner tube and replacing the air
valve has turned the SeaClone into an acceptable skimmer. IMO, it now works as well as my old
BakPak. I have yet to try sealing the collection cup against the intermediate tube, but I have no
doubt this will also increase it's performance.
My purpose in putting up this page is not to encourage people to go out and buy a SeaClone to
use on a large tank. Rather, it is to help those of us who already have one, make it work better. I
still feel this is a skimmer limited to usage on small tanks.
 
wow thanks alot this looks very helpful. I am going to fix the air flow thing. Do you know if they sell that at the LFS or do i have to order it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom