Oh? So now you are playing this "true (professional) identity anonymous" game?
Oh please.... but that's your choice to be one and it's still a free country.
In this case it means that they are trying to push a fabricated utopia that will cost the end user far beyond what they need to spend to achieve the very same thing, which is assuming the end user in question was not an intelligent freethinker that realized they did not need to buy into this whole BS to satisfy their aquaristic needs.
Well what does one have to spend to be successful in the hobby? How can you possibly define this and ask of anyone to hold to such a standard?
Some can do it with a few $, some 1000$'s.
$ is not a measure of success.
Many do not want to piece meal things together also.
They come into a LFs, see the set up, and buy it.
If they are cheap or able, they can DIY or use other items etc.
As I stated before, though Takashi himself may be a really swell guy for the most part, the people behind his marketing empire have other interests in mind, and this is obviously appearing to be somewhat of a discredit to him, and not only to me, but to many other intelligent and observant individuals (hobbyists/professionals) throughout the world.
Well you are certainly entitled to your opinion even if it's an
anonymous one.
I wish Mr. Amano all the best, as I always have, but I feel obligated to publicly acknowledge that his “entity” in a public capacity needs to be seriously addressed if he wishes to be publicly maintained as a serous asset to the freshwater planted tank community.
I see $$$ items, I figure out ways around the cost and ways to reduce it and simplify things. I ask questions like "do we really need algaicides?" and the like......
Amano helps the hobby and promotes it. He's entitled to make a buck as much as the next person. Penac and some other items in the product line are worthless(and they are more than free to come sue me if they so chose). Some stuff is very useful and nice/worth the cost to many. You cannot make blanket statements about the entire line.
You have to go through and see what is useful and what is chaff. You have to be careful, about your assumptions. I do not get that vibe from the comments you've written, but I've seen and met folks in the past that felt the same as you.
This same type of thinking occured 20-25 years ago with Dupla.
See old post on the APD etc and from that, PMDD grew out of it and various other DIY folks and academics got together figured things out, Cables? They were not a winner. Gas tank CO2 and trace dosing?
They where.
How he does it is his business and while I disagree with him on some things, for the most part most of the aesthetic and focus on plants is good for the hobby.
I'd have a hard time arguing otherwise.
And I think you are on shaky ground here with that arguement.
Obviously there will always be ignorant “loyal subjects”, but please, I am only interested in the advancement of this hobby/art form.
As am I. I do much in the way testing and analysis of products and puzzles in the hobby. But many do not enjoy it, but do not mind the benefits from such information either.
In year's past, there where more folks that did this. The hobby on the web tended to be more academic in the approach. I'm hardly loyal unless such loyalty is deserved and earned.
I assure you that Mr. Amano himself is aware of the concern that I have addressed here, however he is a unique and wonderful individual and will address matters as only he sees fit, and beyond that, in a manner that he actually has control of.
Well you slap him and then prop him up again if effort to appear reasonable.
Chaff.
But your base arguement still has issues.
Need I even address other really truly bogus entities significantly involved in our pursuit? Marc Weiss? Don’t even get me started, as I would surely end up with an ugly lawsuit on my hands sought through American courts, though this would inevitably be futile.
I am a big fan of Mr. Amano, and I am only concerned with his wellbeing in posting this.
Really? Does not seem like it.
SeaChem is similarly evasive about Excel, but I am very loyal to them as it is well deserved. But some items they make I have little arguements for using.
They, like ADA, are trying to make $ and promote what they love.
And they do a good good job at it.
Don't like it? Then stop writing, and start making a line that's dirt cheap and do the research yourself. You act like you can do better, so prove it. Actions speak louder than words.
Regards,
Tom Barr