if HR 669 was passed and it was no longer legal to keep non-native pets or fish. would you still do it anyway?
What if....
- Thread starter austinpetemo
- Start date
Yes, I would add it to my downloading music, downloading movies - even if they are still in theaters, and selling Netbooks with OS X, even though Apple doesn't like this. Also my downloading DS ROMS on to my Acekard, and Jailbreaking my Ipod Touch to download cracked apps. Oh an my softmodding my Wii to play burnt game backups. I have quite the rap sheet.
P.S. I'm kidding of course.
P.S. I'm kidding of course.
i live in Canada so it doesn't apply to me 
Also just for the record i don't think it will be passed so don't frett. It sucks that there's a few retards who ruin it for everyone.
Also just for the record i don't think it will be passed so don't frett. It sucks that there's a few retards who ruin it for everyone.
no. im just saying, in the small chance that it does pass, i wanted to know how many other rebels there are like me.
i would probably try to find some fish around here, i could catch oscars and pacu if i could find a good pond, but i would still keep nonatives
If my fish decide to breed in violation of HR 669, I would point out to them that it is a violation of said bill. I would then be forced to sell the off-spring. All this would of course would occur while waiting to be issued a dosage of contraception medication from the gov't.
I would write the fish a cease and desist letter explaining how their reproductive efforts are in violation of federal law. I would also build a fence around my fish tanks to keep the illegal fish out of my country.
I dont think I would be to afraid of the cops busting down my door and looking into my tanks, so I would keep them.