It depends on other factors.... The Pres just doesn't get to "appoint" his agenda... Which is what it may seem to some people.cgrabe said:The President has plenty of power; It's just that much of it is exhibited through the people he appoints to office.
Indigo said:Anyway, IMO, the president in a democratic sense shouldn't be 'all-powerful.' If he was, it wouldn't be a democracy.![]()
gonefishin said:Wow, his own private bowling alley, a mid-eastern county "conquered" in the name of democracy, and still we have starving people in america. isn't our country grand?
If I'm not mistaken (entirely possible), much of the aid we send to foreign nations just gets 'reallocated' by their government. If the government doesn't want help, the people probably won't get it. I think we'd have better luck letting companies outsource to those countries and making them pay relatively generous wages. That would discourage outsourcing AND improve our image.greeneyedlady said:...he could feed a small nation for a couple of years![]()