You may only think ou have algae problems now!

TechAquaria

AC Members
Sep 3, 2009
257
0
0
From this site: http://www.unisci.com/stories/20012/0615013.htm

I took the following:

Photosynthetic Algae Altered To Grow Without Sunlight
For the first time, scientists have introduced a fundamental metabolic change in a single-celled alga so that it no longer requires light to grow. Photosynthetic algae are the major primary producers in aquatic environments. They are also used in industry for food, to make pigments and cosmetics, and for other applications.
Until now, these organisms have mostly been grown in open ponds where the variability of the environment, light limitation and contamination with microbes are frequent problems.
Scientists have now found that by inserting just one gene that catalyzes glucose transport into the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum, the organism can thrive in the dark, getting its energy exclusively from the glucose.
This marks a critical first step toward large-scale, high-density, cost effective cultivation of algae using fermentation technology. The results of this study are published in today's issue of Science.
The Science study is a result of a collaborative effort between researchers at the Department of Plant Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Palo Alto, California, and Martek Biosciences Corporation in Columbia, Maryland.
Glucose is a primary energy source for most cells. For their experiments, the scientists individually inserted several genes responsible for glucose transport from three different organisms into the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.
One of the genes, Hup1, is from the green alga Chlorella kessleri. Three other genes, Hxt1, Hxt2 and Hxt4, come from the yeast Saccharomyces cervisiae, which is widely used in the brewing and baking industries. The final gene, Glut1, and the one that has shown the most promise, is involved in transporting glucose into human red blood cells to maintain metabolic processes.
The investigators introduced each of these genes into the alga and found that both the Hup1 and Glut1 genes allowed it to take up high levels of glucose and thrive in the dark.
In addition to its industrial potential, the newly engineered diatom will allow scientists to make fundamental discoveries about the processes of photosynthesis and other metabolic activities in algae.
The study also has interesting evolutionary implications. As stated by one of the investigators, Arthur Grossman of Carnegie, "This is the first time that a eukaryotic organism has been transformed from a light-dependent to a light-independent growth mode. It is sobering to think that it required one gene to create such a dramatic difference in life-style. This study, and others, are pointing to a future in which metabolic engineering may be an important means for tailoring organisms to meet the demands of an ever-strained global population."
Henry Linsert, Jr., Martek's Chairman and CEO, sees this work as, "a fundamental breakthrough that opens up the commercial development of the vast number of photosynthetic microalgae and the unique compounds they produce."

The Carnegie Institution of Washington has been a pioneering force in basic scientific research since 1902. It is a private nonprofit organization with five research departments in the U.S.: Terrestrial Magnetism and the Geophysical Laboratory in Washington, D.C., Plant Biology in Stanford, California, Observatories in Pasadena, California, and Embryology in Baltimore, Maryland.

Martek Biosciences Corporation develops, manufactures and sells products from microalgae. The company's products include: (1) specialty nutritional oils for infant formula, nutritional supplements and food ingredients that may play a beneficial role in promoting mental and cardiovascular health, and in the development of the eyes and central nervous system in newborns, (2) high value reagents and technologies to visualize molecular interactions for drug discovery and development, and (3) new, powerful fluorescent markers for diagnostics, rapid miniaturized screening and gene and protein detection.
 
Anyone for another horror story?

From this site:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119917293/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

You will find this:
"Apparently, under conditions of air exclusion or darkness, growth of certain algae can continue provided that the proper organic compounds are present to act as a carbon source and if the algae have the enzymes to metabolize them. In addition, the algae which can metabolize such organic sources are, in effect, able to carry out processes usually associated with the bacteria in sewage treatment in waste-stabilization ponds. It is suggested that autochthonous development of algae under such conditions may be partially instrumental in "bloom" formation."

I have found that 'blackouts' are usually most efficient if there is also another factor, or factors, which limit algae growth and/or kill the algae directly--Co2 with its' ability to move the PH towards acid and to provide a form of carbon which is difficult, at best, for most algae to use, is but one example. Eventually, I came to just ignore blackouts and focus on the algae problem.

At first I modeled my thinking in the belief that by causing excellent conditions for plant growth I was creating a situation where the plants were successful in out-competing the algae for nutrients--and this was 'the true picture' of what was happening. I simply had to choose the nutrients most favorable to aquatic plants and NOT favorable to algae. This left me wanting vastly superior materials, means and methods.

At present the form of model my thinking takes is that you simply provide the necessary nutrients, lights, temperature, PH which promotes excellent growth of biological vegetation, and favoring desirable and species specific vegetation--if possible.

However, the real key after the above is done is in constructing conditions which are unfavorable and even toxic to algae--again, if possible. As, the conditions for favorable growth of desirable plants, and the favorable growth of algae occurs are virtually identical. One is always left for the need to attack the algae directly while leaving the plants unaffected to any noticeable degree.

The most desirable 'fix' would be a silver bullet. This bullet would only target algae at some genetic and species specific level and leave all other organisms untouched. I am more afraid today that this will never happen, at least in my lifetime, than I have ever been. As much more research and money is going into developing 'super algaes' than in finding methods of killing them. Bio-fuels, new medicines, etc. fuels the direction this is all taking. Let us pray these 'super algaes' never find their way from lab or production plant into our aquariums. Or, :1zhelp:

Regards,
TA
 
Last edited:
i say we start knitting little blue tights with red capes now. no point in waiting for the first slip.
 
AquariaCentral.com