View Full Version : Filters
pianeon
12-20-2004, 3:20 PM
I recently purchased a complete 55 gallon setup from a friend who didn't have time for it. In the box of equipment he gave me there is a Fluval 304 and an AquaTech filter that looks like it attaches to the back of the tank.
Is there any reason I would need both of these running? Does the AquaTech do something that the Fluval doesn't?
Thanks for helping a newbie.
OrionGirl
12-20-2004, 3:28 PM
Many people use multiple filters. It's a good way to protect the biological filtration by dividing it into multiple locations, as well as expand the amount of beneficial bacteria that can be supported. You can also run a wider variety of filter media this way. Depending on what fish you have, you may need just one, or you may want to run both of them. Personally, I think more filters are better, so even in a lightly stocked tank I run more than one.
geoffgarcia
12-20-2004, 3:54 PM
while its true that the more room for media the better I personally would only use 1 filter.
rather than running 5 small units just get a big one that can do it all.
Harlock
12-20-2004, 3:58 PM
I am in the planning stages of a 29 gallon myself and I inten to use two filters. I just like the redundant features idea... 2 filters, 2 heaters, in case one malfunctions.
StreetCypher
12-20-2004, 4:01 PM
I suggest using both the filters.
Why not, right? You have two so use them. The benefits of multiple filters are great (what OG said).
All of my tanks above 10 gallons are multi-filtered. AFAIK, it is not possible to over-filter a tank. Too much current is possible, but that is a different issue.
geoffgarcia
12-20-2004, 4:15 PM
I am in the planning stages of a 29 gallon myself and I inten to use two filters. I just like the redundant features idea... 2 filters, 2 heaters, in case one malfunctions.
I've been keeping fish for about 8 years now, never had a filter fail.
and if one were to fail it wouldn't be a big deal. I leave my filter off for weeks at a time anyway....plus as long as the heat in your house is on and your tank isn't right next to a window then redundant heaters is kinda pointless to.
I dunno...that idea seems like a big waste of money to me.
but if it works for you...
Harlock
12-20-2004, 4:18 PM
I've been keeping fish for about 8 years now, never had a filter fail.
and if one were to fail it wouldn't be a big deal. I leave my filter off for weeks at a time anyway....plus as long as the heat in your house is on and your tank isn't right next to a window then redundant heaters is kinda pointless to.
I dunno...that idea seems like a big waste of money to me.
but if it works for you...
It works for me. Peace of mind is priceless.
StreetCypher
12-20-2004, 5:16 PM
I've been keeping fish for about 8 years now, never had a filter fail.
and if one were to fail it wouldn't be a big deal. I leave my filter off for weeks at a time anyway....plus as long as the heat in your house is on and your tank isn't right next to a window then redundant heaters is kinda pointless to.
I dunno...that idea seems like a big waste of money to me.
but if it works for you...
I'd bet leaving the filter off for weeks at a time cause you to recycle, right? And just curious, but why leave tham off for so long?
As for the waste of money, i think its better to have a backup (in the case of a filter failing/breaking) to protect your fish. I think of it as protecting an investment, i paid a hefty sum of money for my fish, and the $50 for a second filter is all worth it.