PDA

View Full Version : power vs canister filter



hle_81
02-26-2003, 2:26 PM
which filter provides more biological filtration?

VoodooChild
02-26-2003, 2:29 PM
The shear size of the canisters would make them the choice. The Fluvals and Eheims and to a lesser extent the Magnums can all be equipped with some form of bio filter, usually in the form of ceramics. However, AquaClears have alot of media space and do a good job if you're strapped for cash. The bio-wheel on the Penguins isn't half bad either.

NJ Devils Fan
02-26-2003, 6:41 PM
The bio wheels on the Emperors are even better then the Penguin.

Tyler718
02-26-2003, 8:07 PM
I would say a canister is best. With the canister you kave many options to put in them. You can fill them with different kinds of biological media. I use ceramic noodles and bio-balls.

The other advantage is that they can be hidden out of sight and the tank can be put closer to the wall.

JSchmidt
02-27-2003, 8:44 AM
I don't know that either type of filter produces more biofiltration. It depends on the size of filter, how it's packed, etc.

Both can provide adequate biofiltration for most aquariums. The decision between HOT or canister filters usually hinges on other aspects: cost to purchase, cost of media, esthetics (what it looks like on you tank), longevity of the filter itself, and others.

Are you trying to decide which type of filter to get? If yes, you could write a bit about your situation and needs and I'm sure we could give you some more specific advice.

Jim

Heady
03-07-2003, 9:08 AM
(oops sorry)

Heady
03-07-2003, 9:10 AM
I am thinking about buying a canister for my 100 gallon tank. After reading all the comments about canisters on the board, I'm going to buy an Eheim, a Pro if I can afford it.

Anyway, with their Pro series, the filters they offer jump from a 100 gallon capacity (2026) to a 160 gallon capacity (2028). Would I be able to go longer between filter cleaning if I bought the 160 gal model, or am I just as well off sticking with the 100 gal model?

JSchmidt
03-07-2003, 9:45 AM
For a 100 gallon tank, I would definitely go with the 2028. Not that the ratings are all that meaningful, but the sites I see rate the 2026 up to 90 gallons and the 2028 up to 160.

The 2026 holds two baskets of media, while the 2028 holds three. I don't know that you can look at it from the perspective of cleaning frequency... the more relevant consideration would be space for biological media. In both filters, poop and stuff will break down and pollute the water in the same amount of time, so the maintenance interval shouldn't be much different. What is different is the ability of the filter to efficiently oxidize ammonia. The 2028 will offer much more space for bacterial colonization and can support a larger bioload.

I bet you'll like your Eheim. Have fun!


Jim

125gJoe
03-07-2003, 6:35 PM
Originally posted by Heady
I am thinking about buying a canister for my 100 gallon tank. After reading all the comments about canisters on the board, I'm going to buy an Eheim, a Pro if I can afford it.....Did you see how nice the Rena Filstars are? And how affordable they are? (I must be slowing down...on mentioning such great products..) A Filstar XP-3 would be an excellent choice! Link: Rena Filstars (http://www.rena.net/us/rena_filtres_xp.html)

Throw in a Vortex XL for ocassional use, and look-out! Your water will look like air it will be sooooo clean! :)

disclaimer..: I'm not "telling" you what to buy, just a suggestion.. :)

fishaddict
03-07-2003, 9:23 PM
Id use a canister filter possibly an eheim i have a 2026 and it is humongous.

d_b
03-07-2003, 10:07 PM
Have to agree with 80gjoe. I use my XL on the first of every month and tell you what. Cystal clear. The 2 Emperor's and 1 XP3 run full time.

goldfish freak
03-07-2003, 10:20 PM
LoL! 80gJoe, you should be the spokes person for the Rena Filstar
;) :D , seeing how you seem to love that line of filters. Are you sure AP isn't paying you for the endorsements? :p LoL!:D

Just teasing you :) .