It seems like the candidates from the major parties are neck and neck, and I wondered if it would make a difference if one carried a gene making him glow green.
So, would it make you more or less likely to vote for a fluorescent candidate?
You'll have to explain this one to me. I don't need posts, I don't get any points for posting in GCC, so I'm not sure what this means. I was just entertaining myself.
It seems like the candidates from the major parties are neck and neck, and I wondered if it would make a difference if one carried a gene making him glow green.
So, would it make you more or less likely to vote for a fluorescent candidate?
lOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.. Oh man, that one caught me off guard... I totally agree with Sensai... you definately gotta let me know what you're cmoking man... lol
Well for the record, I voted no, it could have unexpected consequences. It seems that a lot of politicians have some floozies on the side and I dont think we want that getting into the gene pool. Of course...it certainly could show an interesting trail of....pleasure. Hmmm...
I hope I'm not "post whoring" by chit chatting in GCC though...you know....the place where posts don't count anyway...
Well for the record, I voted no, it could have unexpected consequences. It seems that a lot of politicians have some floozies on the side and I dont think we want that getting into the gene pool. Of course...it certainly could show an interesting trail of....pleasure. Hmmm...
