Thanks for the feedback. I like the idea of culturing the bacteria in a bucket instead of in the tank. Maybe something I should try.
However, I am not sure why you think fishless cycling is a bad idea. The regular cycling process with starter fishes works, and I have done it. However I feel, even with right amount of load and food and periodic cleaning, during the ammonia peak, the fish gets stressed which can be avoided by fishless cycling (even if it takes the same duration).
Thanks,
Malay
No, they do not because there's no NH4 to begin with.
None, zero, zip, even with a 5000$ spect at the lab, there's no measurable NH4 even down to 10 parts per Billion which is the general low range for anything a hobbyists might ever hope to measure. While I am a hobbyists, I also do research and have access to many let's say, high grade research equipment and am familiar with most standard methods in water analysis.
Plants nab it all and convert it directly into proteins.
Plant roots are also loaded with bacteria. I wait a couple of days and then add things like SAE's and later after a week, Amano shrimp.
I've never measured any NH4, it's used as fast as it produced.
Folks that have done FC often get green blooms and I see these post over and over again.
NH4 in the tank itself(Why?), do it in a bucket, or run the bacteria media in an established tank first, do the basic work first, like water changes to remove any waste build up, you still are left with NO3 at the end and that's not going anywhere, but with plants, that too is also removed.
You can use algae or plants for any type of aquarium to filter things and remove any waste in any type of aquarium, not just planted tanks, reefs, marine fish only, fish only FW etc.
I like to grow plants, not bacteria. Nothing wrong with bacteria as back up, but the focus should be on the plants, not testing NH4 cycling and spending a lot of time with test kits for several weeks.
Then the proponents suggest that new folks should "learn" and tell them they should "test". I'm not so sure that they really should.
Maybe folks trying to push test kits and sales are behind this? hehe
I have to wonder many times, who got into this hobby to play with water test kits?
I've yet to meet a single person to date. Did you?
I do enough testing here at work, I really do not want to come home and do it again when I know the processes involved in aquatic ecosystem cycling. The issue I have is that this FC method does nothing to export the NO3 and NH4, the
habits aquarist need are simpler than all this, do a water change, add plants, take consistent care the of the tank etc. FC does not address that. Instead, it gets into a lot of detail, test kits etc. Most folks do better if they get into this hobby doing the more obvious things that are part of the routine. Otherwise they stress out, get lost in the readings, spend a lot of time learning about all that and do not focus on things like the plants. Maybe some folks do and want to learn everything right away......most do not however.
Basic ecosystem and aquarium care. That goes farther for any aquarium than the start up phase. Any aquarist can do well for the first few weeks.........
Question is, can they do well over time and stay in the hobby? What will determine that?
Not FC.............
See how many GW blooms folks have had here due to this FC.............
Regards,
Tom Barr