OrionGirl said:
You also are assuming that everyone who reads your comments will not jump to a conclusion and decide that kuhlie's are fine with just fish waste. I've seen it happen entirely too often, and no matter how right you may be in saying you didn't say that, I care more about the results. Someone reads that, thinks they can add kuhlie's and never clean the bottom again (see how the assumptions pile up?).
I don't have a problem with any of the posts...I just want the FULL answer, rather than the simple one that will lead people astray.
Respectfully, that is not logical.
First, unless we are talking about a tank that has ONLY Kühli's in it, we will not have to worry about them not getting something other than fish waste. They will surely without fail get excess food. And in a tank without other fish, one surely would assume that the owner would be smart enough to feed them, since there are no fish producing fecal matter.
Secondly, I never vaccum my tank. Never. That has to do with a lot of things, but part of the reason is the Kühli's. Part of the reason is plants. Part of the reason is snails. Part of the reason is I don't keep fish that are high waste producers. And part of it is probably also Amano shrimp and corys. So yes, some people who handle their tank in a certain way can make that assumption that Kühi's are part of the equation for that kind of success in keeping a tank bottom
naturally healthy and part of the food chain.
Now, that being said... if I took out the snails (MTS) and the Kühli's, I bet you dollars to doughnuts I would have to vacuum... not often mind you, but I know I would see a buildup. I have about 4-5 Kühlis in an area of about 5 sq. ft. About 1 Kühli per square foot.
But quite honestly you are backtracking from your claim that no fish eat "waste", from Kühli's don't eat waste, then into an explanation that is fraught with false assumptions that you made and then tried to imply that I had stated them, and now it is down to stating that you were just trying to make sure nobody got the wrong information or made the wrong assumption.
I stand by the veracity of what I said. Your intent was not to clarify, as you did not posit "clarifying" remarks, but rather contentious ones which you later have not been able to defend or substantiate.
It is a far cry from "Kühlis don't fish eat waste. No fish does." to "well, let's just clarify that you probably should not expect a Kühli to take care of all the fish waste, or that you will be able to stop cleaning your tank the way you have been. And make sure to toss them some sinking carnivore pellets from time to time in the dark..."
One is clarifying, one is an argument.
Just to clarify...