Having researched lightly on the subject I have found the theoretical methods by which ac can be re-used. My interpretation of what I found on the subject is as follows:
The main focus appears that the steam is what drives out the unwanted debris and opens the pores back up for re-use. I would have to say that based on those theories, your methods very well may accomplish it. It also appears that what renders the ac as expended is the amount of debris that fill the pores. Further testing has shown that steam or chemicals will strip the debris making it once again useful.
Based on these interpretations I would suggest that your method may indeed be plausible and functional. I think if you were to examine the carbon under a microscope before your "treatment" and then after it, it would show you if it was indeed working. I would also think that possibly if you were to find any "waste" after your treatment, either in the final rinse or in the cooking container, that would further support your claim of reclamation. I would not consider the initial rinses as anything more than a cursory rinsing to remove bulk waste and not a portion of the actual reclamation process.
If no one else choose to follow your idea and wants to nay-say it that is their right, but I for one am interested in what you come up with.
Please keep us (or me) informed.
Thanks!
The main focus appears that the steam is what drives out the unwanted debris and opens the pores back up for re-use. I would have to say that based on those theories, your methods very well may accomplish it. It also appears that what renders the ac as expended is the amount of debris that fill the pores. Further testing has shown that steam or chemicals will strip the debris making it once again useful.
Based on these interpretations I would suggest that your method may indeed be plausible and functional. I think if you were to examine the carbon under a microscope before your "treatment" and then after it, it would show you if it was indeed working. I would also think that possibly if you were to find any "waste" after your treatment, either in the final rinse or in the cooking container, that would further support your claim of reclamation. I would not consider the initial rinses as anything more than a cursory rinsing to remove bulk waste and not a portion of the actual reclamation process.
If no one else choose to follow your idea and wants to nay-say it that is their right, but I for one am interested in what you come up with.
Please keep us (or me) informed.
Thanks!