Alright folks, I've taken a close look at Lady G, and I've found some interesting things.
Yes you should take a close look at EVERYONE in this game Mad.Point 1
Some may recall that yesterday, BKW and I were exchanging posts. BKW voted for me claiming that he wanted some questions answered, but didn't ask any questions. As he didn't ask any questions, I didn't bother to respond...later he went on to say that I was scummy for not responding to his vote, I claimed he was scummy for voting without a real reason. Whatever.
The interesting thing to me, is how Lady G inserted herself into the exchange. Now keep in mind that anyone is free to jump into a conversation, and I always welcome discussion, so jumping in was not a problem. What interested me most was why she jumped in, and what she was saying. So here we go:
I didn't really "insert" myself into your exchange, I made mention that I asked a question and you replied...yes it was intended toward Bkw's post of you not responding to him, but I wasn't really inserting my self anywhere.
By this time BKW had voted for me to have questions answered, but asked no question. When he finally asked a question, I responded. He said I should have responded to the vote (without the question), I said it didn't make sense to respond when there was no question to respond to....Whatever.
Here's where Lady G jumps in.....Looks like she agrees with me, a question should have been asked if BKW wanted a response. She then goes on to dispute something else I said about being scum the last time BKW and I played together.
I explain that she misunderstood my post...
Here she understands that she misunderstood my earlier post. Goes on to apparently agree with me in the discussion that BKW had earlier...If you want an answer, ask a question.
Now BKW calls her on her response, and claims she never really asked a question.
Lady G responds to BKW saying 'yeah, I technically didn't ask a question, and it is weird that Madcrawdad didn't respond to the vote you cast for no reason..' Huh?
No I didn't say I technically didn't ask a question, you need to re read that one Mad I said it wasn't really in the form of a question "why did you say that" kind of a question but it was a question non the less and you answered it, it even had ? at the end. Please don't twist my meaning to try and make it fit your off base comment.
Whose side is Lady G really on in this discussion between myself and BKW? Whose side is not the real question, but why does she seem to be standing in the middle and flicking bits of scum in both directions?
I wasn't standing in the middle, I made a statement bkw responded to my statement I wouldn't really call that "standing in the middle" of anything. And at this point in time I am on my side, but if you looked at my posts you should know who came out on top of that whole scenario..let's see I had BKW on my list and not you so you tell me, how was that misread?
By this time our discussion had ended, and BKW even posted a little smiley face...maybe as if to say 'all is well between us'? But Lady G seems to be blowing on embers and trying to get something started. Why?
Point 2
Here's the same quote I used earlier, but I'm reposting it to make my second point.
Here she says that she would personally ask if someone voted for her for no reason. What if someone voted for you and gave a bogus reason, Lady G? Would you be interested?
I did not respond to DC because well even though it was a stupid reason, which I may of used later..at this time I saw no reason to bring attention upon it...it he had just said I vote Lady G I would of asked "may I ask why"
Here DC casts a vote for Lady G because she's fooled him in past games. Clearly an anti-town move on DC's part. Past games have absolutely no bearing on this game...
Agreed but so many do this, "Oh Mad isn't posting like normal he must be evil" not that I really think that at this point just an example.
Here's Lady G's response to DC's vote for her...not a very strong response.
It wasn't a very strong reason didn't deserve a strong response I figured others would realize it was weak to say the least, why bother?
Now in this quote she goes after Ogre for basically saying that he'd consider lynching Coler, because Coler would be dangerous to the town as a zombie. Keep in mind that DC said basically the same thing about Lady G (and even voted for her) that Ogre did about Coler. So why's she just picking out Ogre and floating his name out there as possible scum? DC never makes it onto her list of suspicious players, but now Ogre's her top candidate. Somethings just not right.
Yes and there was more to it then just he said that, and yes I believe that is a good reason to add him to my "list". DC hasn't made it there yet, simply because he has done nothing but make a nonsense vote at this time, which like I said I do not believe others would take in consideration to vote me...it's not really a good argument IMO.
I'm not saying that Ogre shouldn't be on her list, mind you, I'm saying that based on her reasoning, DC should be there also.
Ummm not really Mad, as I stated before there is alot more on Ogre than DC at this point in time. Are you mad because I didn't get all defencive at DC for that??? I saw no reason it wasn't worth the time and effort it would take.
IMO, Lady G is the best candidate for scum that I've seen all day...
I vote to lynch Lady G