Ice, I was about to ask you why you didn't agree with myself and Mad on DD and LadyG... then you posted.
To be honest, I'm still looking for a reason in there. Just because they didn't attack you isn't a very good reason (IMO).
Let me post a few lists for discussion:
Most obvious turn targets (both two nights):
My most suspicious list: (this would be for the first two zombies)
- Dangerdoll
- LadyG
- JohnLarson
- Ewurm (low prob... have no experience with the wurm, but posts not very in depth or useful)
My almost trusted players
Some general paranoid thoughts.
If Mad or Ice were the turn victims, then I and others are being led astray. However, I notice that Mad and Ice are against and for the same two players (LadyG and DD).
Now, if Ice is the turn victim, then he may be trying to protect them. If Mad is the turn victim, then he may be trying to have them eliminated. If neither is the turn victim, then we have an honest difference of opinion and (based on the evidence) I am leaning much more Mad's way that Ice's.
Coler is somewhat surprising to me right now. He seems to be still on the vote off the non-players thing... which, I admit, others started and kept bringing up, but it is surprising to me that he would get involved. I am very much looking forward to a few more posts from him regarding his analysis of the day's discussion.
It's also curious that Mad, myself and Coler have pretty much the same list of suspicious players... which is really pushing me into the direction of believing them more innocent than not. Mad started and I kind of started the DD/LadyG thing and Coler seems to have jumped onboard with little encouragement or statements of support.
Right now, I trust mad more than Coler. But that's like saying I'd rather have smallpox than ebola.
DD's analysis of Ewurm is interesting too. It's a pretty good piece, but then, it's not hard to push the kind of play that eWurm has done so far as suspicious.
JohnLarson is also acting unusual. I don't really understand what his hangups are with the voting and the lack of analysis. He doesn't post much, that I understand. However, his posts in past games have seemed to be much more in depth and insightful than this game's posts.
There are 3 zombies and 4 townie roles. That's seven players. I have seven people that I have studied somewhat and have found causes for concern. It's my experience that all players with a role play somewhat differently than 'normal'. I know I do (and I think all of you know it as well).
Is my list perfect? No way. But I would very much like to hear thoughts from everyone on my lists. And a 'I agree' won't cut it. Let's hear why you agree or disagree.
At this point, I'm a hair''s breath from pulling my vote for DD, I just have no where to park it right now. We have about 24 hours. Time to crank up the discussion.
Ewurm, I REALLY REALLY want to hear some stuff from you. BKW< you and jpap too!