I did, but not understanding how reading up on the thread from 2-6 is answered by the other.
Ummm...where did i say that i was sitting here reading the thread from 2 - 6? Oh, i did not..i said i had other things to do...
I did, but not understanding how reading up on the thread from 2-6 is answered by the other.
If Colers been your top suspect why not place the vote then switch if need be?
What if something had come up and you couldn't place a vote?
I'd rather see a vote and it be switched to not see any vote and a UD.
Because i dont do snap votes. Gun for me as much as you like..You learn soon enough that i am innocent.
How is it a snap vote if he was your top suspect?
What did you read in todays events that makes him your top suspect?
One thing that bothers me niko is that it took you over an hour to vote for coler after "making a case" for him...care to explain why?I have gone through his posts...hence why i quoted the posts of his in my earlier post...It makes me laugh how your all gunning for an innocent when the evil ones are just laughing at you..
One thing that bothers me niko is that it took you over an hour to vote for coler after "making a case" for him...care to explain why?
jeez...no need to get defensive, just wondering why if you mention that coler is your top suspect after making a case that you feel the need to wait to voteYou may be a person who just sits here watching the mafia thread, i am not...i made a case for DD, but did i go out and put my vote on her? No, i did not. Just because someone makes a case for a person, does not mean they have to stick their vote on them there and then.
You may be a person who just sits here watching the mafia thread, i am not...i made a case for DD, but did i go out and put my vote on her? No, i did not. Just because someone makes a case for a person, does not mean they have to stick their vote on them there and then.
And niko...how does this sentence pertain to the rest of what you said...are you trying to say that RL got in the way, so to speak...???