You know the more I think about Johns posts and "investigation" on Fungi...I am really wondering...
Well six of the nine ARE evil. So almost everyone IS evil. There are more evil than innocents this game!
The good news is that the innocents get one investigation each.
I propose this question to my fellow island mates: If you were granted an investigation, who would you investigate and why?
I would investigate Fungi because I they have not played in awhile and were early to post.
I hope everyone will particapate in this.
So he starts with his question to who would investigate who and why...adding he would chose Fungi...which threw me off slightly as most would pick someone like Ice, HN, RB...could this of been a set up from the start?
That would make sense if you both were on the same evil team, now (this is a stretch) pretend you are innocent and not on the same evil team as Ice.
Rb had said he would investigate Ice then Lie about it...and YES, it did seem like a good idea didn't it?
You not wanting to investigate someone at this stage of the game, arouses my suspicion.
My guess is that you do not have an investigation, hence the line "I don't think". Anyone that does not have an investigation is evil.
Fungi, you are not an innocent.
I vote to banish Fungi from the Island.
I suggest that your teamates distance themselves and let you go.
Then his vote for Fungi, adding teamates should distance themselves...John did you try something this game we have not seen before? Are you voting day one for one of your mates to "distance"?
Ice, why not vote for Fungi? I can assure you that my vote will not be changing. I have an idea.
I retract my vote for Fungi and vote to banish Fungi from the island.
So there I have used my switch.
As far as trying to banish a teamate on day one, I just do not see it happening, while it would be a great move, I do not think many are willing to take that risk. Good job of putting it out there, are you on Fungi's team?
So here it sits, I am calling Fungi out. I feel only Fungi's teamates would protect them.
Here you add it WOULD be a great move.
Lady G, you have made some valid points.
So far no one has said that, but why wouldn't you believe them? This trick would work once. That very person would be on the chopping block the next day if they lied. Also, once they put their investigation out there, they would no longer be a threat to the mafia teams, just an innocent by-stander.
So I see no reason not to believe them.
I had said "would we believe someone who comes out"? Unless they named a team mate and "claimed" to get a investigation, and I believe the "innocents" are a threat to the mafia aren't they? Are the innocents not suppose to be taking out the mafia?? Wouldn't that be a threat? Hmmm, maybe not you are still here....
Let's just get this out of the way.
I had an investagation and I used it on Fungi, mostly because I felt that the other players with investigations would not investigate Fungi.
Fungi is a member of the Emerald Alliance.
Then he comes out saying he had the investigaton, IF he was so sure a "innocent" wouldn't be a threat to the mafia anymore..why did he not say this when he voted Fungi?
If a "mafia" comes from one team they can name a person either innocent or on another team (Most likely they will not name a teammate). They will not know what role that person is but at this point there would be a 50% chance that they are innocent and a 50% chance that they are on the other team (3 and 3).
Still a high risk move only to put their own neck out there. Ice's idea is better, just name one of your own and then have the trust of the rest of the island.
If I was mafia, it would be best to name someone from my own team that I knew was mafia than to take a 50/50 risk. If I failed on the 50/50 I would be dead for sure.
After Pap said the above post about a mafia from another team could come out and have a good chance of beign right...John adds "Ices" idea is better just name one of your own and gain the trust of the town....is this what you have done John??
There are some more posts I want to pull, but didn't want this to end up a whole page so I am splitting them up.
Up to this point...John sure seems to think it would be a great move for a member of the mafia to name one of his team mates for "trust".