HN,
The lynch does not stop a turn (which has a 25% chance of being a hit). The fact that the town's abilty to lynch was stopped hurts the town. No one discussed lynching no one. We, as a town, have the right to vote no one, but everyone thought it was in the town's best interest to lynch someone. While the odds are against us (which they always will be), everyone voted to lynch someone. If RB thought that we should not vote for someone, then why no discuss it, instead he put the town in a situation where none of our votes counted.
Somehow you are okay with this. Is RB hinting to be a power role? Is that his reason? I don't see it. I think he is EAII and his game play day one versus day two is very clear. Now day three he gives this long post. When does rb post long posts? His explaination is stranger than his actions. I quoted a strange part from the end of his speech, maybe it was missed.
Who if not RB is a good suspect?
My list (in order I want to see them lynched):
RB
HN
LG
Where did I say that a tie stopped the turn?
No, I am nowhere close to "okay" with what he did. It pissed me off and I wouldn't be too concerned to see him go for it even if innocent. I don't think he's the EA because to do what he did if he was EA would be stupid. He's alot of things (insert your own adjectives), but I don't believe stupid is one of them.
If I was EA, I would try my best to make a few allies, by agreeing with a handful of people and blending in. I would not clash with anyone, because I would want to have as many "friends" as possible. I would follow as much as possible. I would remind folks about my skimming and that I always look evil and like being evil. I would also be very helpful to the noobs.
You make a very good case for yourself.
This post really concerns me.
1) Defending RB again. Plant, it's not like we have anything to go on here. The only thing we're doing by not lynching someone is letting the evils have a larger group to hide in. Plus, they have a larger field of potential targets and the good/guy team has a harder time figuring anything out (because no information from each night can be trusted, since anyone can be turned).
2) Rb can think anything he wants (he obviously does), but starting the turn of events that he did (and G and hooked continued) caused a whole lot of crap that we have to wade through that doesn't get us anywhere.
If he had said, I think we need to not lynch someone and tied the vote and we all agreed, that would be one thing. But the last minute switch, with no explanation, which started a long confused sequence... that's anti-town.
3) So pix can't vote for who he thinks is evil? That's anti-town? I happen to think that LadyG is more than a little suspicious as well and with something useful from RB, might consider changing my vote to her.
4) Someone, for Pete's sake, tell me what is up with all the Jensons stuff.
I totally agree with the anti-town part.
Only speaking for my Jensons "stuff"... To me she fit the "profile" of who I think Z would have picked to replace Catfish. She's a low poster, always makes it deep into the game, and is always hard to lynch (I know I've tried when evil to get her lynched). Also as I stated before, there's something in her posting that reminds me of when she was the lone mass murderer. The thing that locked it in for me was the pop in vote for Chill to put him 2 votes above her. That and the fact that she hasn't since posted makes me believe I'm on the right track. I also like bkw for the turn. Nothing solid here yet, but I think his vote on me with no real supporting info may have been a first attempt at trying to defend his new master.