Mafia 34-Time Crisis(the Play)

Status
Not open for further replies.
And to make it oficial..I vote to lynch ( whoever the heck he wants to be this week) HOOKED NEWBIE, aka, HN, HK, HB, Huggie bear, baby face....ect, ect ect.
 
Jeez, ..I am just kinda flabbergasted...what the hell do you guys think you are doing?..you are all playing like its night three and the game is hanging in the balance?..

HN: Wow, ..HN, HK, HB, whatever your name is this week...what is going on, a spar with LG?..come on, ..and a suicide pact already?..what are you jumping out of the gate for so early?..If you were innocent, You wouldn't be lynching yourself, ..you would want to stick around and play...cause we all know HN would want to catch the bad guy, so, ..can't catch yourself, but you can
sure get yourself lynched huh? I know your personality well enough, that your laughing about this in a chat somewhere..."watch how far i take it, and they won't lynch me..."

Why wait until day 3 to get things moving? If you think I'm laughing about it in chat then vote for me. I believe I may have a bad guy (aka naughty girl) already. This list of your's may be useful to look back on for folks. It looks alot like one that Jensons put out last game.
 
Why wait until day 3 to get things moving? If you think I'm laughing about it in chat then vote for me. I believe I may have a bad guy (aka naughty girl) already. This list of your's may be useful to look back on for folks. It looks alot like one that Jensons put out last game.

Wow, nothing like trying to throw suspicion out at everyone!!! It may look like jensons, but i wrote it all on my own!!:lipssealedsmilie:
 
Judge wakes groggy from a very long weekend..and catches the local weather..High of 97 today ..ugh!! its so hot, and humid! Just as she is about to change the channel, the local news anounces that things have gone crazy in ACVILLE...

Citizens are fighting..and the normal cheery banter has been erased from the streets. More on this story at 10!

Wow! she thinks to herself!! wonder if its the heat?..Judge thows on her swinsuit, and figures she is gonna head to the river for a bit, maybe some cool water and quiet time will help clear her head.

 
I don't have a reasonable excuse I don't even have an unreasonable one I'm not sure where I got the number. I also haven't seen a reasonable explanation for slipping on this number. Ice's idea that I'm subtracting the terrorist doesn't make sense to me. Three terrorist would just be too small a group even with an oppurtunity for one later turn.

I agree Z a smart Terrorist would jump on it for distancing reasons, however, a smart terrorist could also jump on it as a way to get an innocent lynched. I have no real problem with being lynched tonight just as long as the town learns something from it.

Well I think Ice's assumption is that there would be 3 Terrorists currently plus the Sniper, plus one Turn, so 5 total. But IF, big IF, you counted the Boss out of the three then it could be concievably six. With 20 Players, and some communicating Innocents I would tend to agree that this sounds like a low number, but I don't know BKWs thought process, all I know is that 17 is an odd number to pull out of thin air. I'd rather vote on a stronger case but this is what I have got.
 
I'm not so sure about Chill at this point and my vote may very well change to him at nightfall if I see something more. My biggest problem with Chill's slip up is that there is no excuse. As has been pointed out 17 & 20 are not even remotely close to each other and he quoted RB's count of 20 in his post. Chill's defense of himself is "I have no defense". I don't like it.

The other thing I keep seeing is people calling HN...HK, HB, etc...when B & K are not even close to N. Are all of these people guilty too? The fact that Chill's may be a similar simple mistake is why I can't vote for him on it yet.

I will take HN up on his offer because it is the best thing I have right now and just in case I don't get to a computer before nightfall.

I vote to lynch Hooked Newbie

Blah I after I read this I just couldn't help myself.

I retract my vote for Chill and vote to lynch Dawg.

You are not sure about Chill then spend a paragraph explaining why Chill is guilty, THEN vote for HN because people abbrieviate his name funny and he asked you too. I don't know if this is a better case than the one for Chill, but it feels better.
 
I read through these posts all the time thinking to myself... if I ever said something like this I would be tied to a rail lynched so fast my head would spin. However, in your case I am not sure how to interpret it. The point of the game is to lynch the bad guys. Throw away votes do not help the town achieve this. I understand it is early in the game and there is not a lot to go on, but you should still vote for the person you most suspect. We have all lynched an Innocent or two, or twenty. It happens, but we get information based on who votes for who and why. Your vote is quite clearly there just to dodge having to make a choice. But BKW said there was not to be any UDs Tonight, so why vote at all? In my opinion if you are not willing to vote for someone that has a chance to be lynched, that is the same as voting No One Tonight.

NJ does seem to be talking out of both sides of her mouth her posts... admitting she has nothing, but interjecting little sniping comments at the same time. Her timing is suspect, and it seems like she's trying to stir things up a little.

I think that somebody may have snagged a big fish, and the little fishies are starting to jump around, to try to help break the line... Question is, who's got the fish on the line?
 
Hey I haven't read anything yet but I'm curious as to whether during the night I got lynched. I only have a view minutes to skim too...
 
NJ, something concerns me here. You and I have played 1 1/2 games together. In the 1st you were doc, and got lynched very early on. In the 2nd you were Don and left under mysterious circumstances fairly early on ;).

Correction - I was not the don. I was just a plain mafia. And the play styles were completely different, here I'm talking about myself and why it's difficult to pinpoint a decision I don't want to be mistaken about. In that case I was heckbent on discrediting someone else.

But on the facts, you are mistaken. I wasn't the don.
 
How would you know enough about my playing style to say 'the ever suspicious, crafty minded, superior playing Madcrawdad. He eats strategies for breakfast'? It really makes me think that you may have been hearing things in a chatroom, and could be trying to stir things up. Care to comment?

I didn't play that many rounds, but I watched you and Ogre and Coler, etc., play several rounds before that. That's all. You and I also typically go head to head in rounds. That's why I always like to get a feel for what you are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
AquariaCentral.com