And to make it oficial..I vote to lynch ( whoever the heck he wants to be this week) HOOKED NEWBIE, aka, HN, HK, HB, Huggie bear, baby face....ect, ect ect.
Jeez, ..I am just kinda flabbergasted...what the hell do you guys think you are doing?..you are all playing like its night three and the game is hanging in the balance?..
HN: Wow, ..HN, HK, HB, whatever your name is this week...what is going on, a spar with LG?..come on, ..and a suicide pact already?..what are you jumping out of the gate for so early?..If you were innocent, You wouldn't be lynching yourself, ..you would want to stick around and play...cause we all know HN would want to catch the bad guy, so, ..can't catch yourself, but you can
sure get yourself lynched huh? I know your personality well enough, that your laughing about this in a chat somewhere..."watch how far i take it, and they won't lynch me..."
Why wait until day 3 to get things moving? If you think I'm laughing about it in chat then vote for me. I believe I may have a bad guy (aka naughty girl) already. This list of your's may be useful to look back on for folks. It looks alot like one that Jensons put out last game.
I don't have a reasonable excuse I don't even have an unreasonable one I'm not sure where I got the number. I also haven't seen a reasonable explanation for slipping on this number. Ice's idea that I'm subtracting the terrorist doesn't make sense to me. Three terrorist would just be too small a group even with an oppurtunity for one later turn.
I agree Z a smart Terrorist would jump on it for distancing reasons, however, a smart terrorist could also jump on it as a way to get an innocent lynched. I have no real problem with being lynched tonight just as long as the town learns something from it.
I'm not so sure about Chill at this point and my vote may very well change to him at nightfall if I see something more. My biggest problem with Chill's slip up is that there is no excuse. As has been pointed out 17 & 20 are not even remotely close to each other and he quoted RB's count of 20 in his post. Chill's defense of himself is "I have no defense". I don't like it.
The other thing I keep seeing is people calling HN...HK, HB, etc...when B & K are not even close to N. Are all of these people guilty too? The fact that Chill's may be a similar simple mistake is why I can't vote for him on it yet.
I will take HN up on his offer because it is the best thing I have right now and just in case I don't get to a computer before nightfall.
I vote to lynch Hooked Newbie
I read through these posts all the time thinking to myself... if I ever said something like this I would be tied to a rail lynched so fast my head would spin. However, in your case I am not sure how to interpret it. The point of the game is to lynch the bad guys. Throw away votes do not help the town achieve this. I understand it is early in the game and there is not a lot to go on, but you should still vote for the person you most suspect. We have all lynched an Innocent or two, or twenty. It happens, but we get information based on who votes for who and why. Your vote is quite clearly there just to dodge having to make a choice. But BKW said there was not to be any UDs Tonight, so why vote at all? In my opinion if you are not willing to vote for someone that has a chance to be lynched, that is the same as voting No One Tonight.
NJ, something concerns me here. You and I have played 1 1/2 games together. In the 1st you were doc, and got lynched very early on. In the 2nd you were Don and left under mysterious circumstances fairly early on.
How would you know enough about my playing style to say 'the ever suspicious, crafty minded, superior playing Madcrawdad. He eats strategies for breakfast'? It really makes me think that you may have been hearing things in a chatroom, and could be trying to stir things up. Care to comment?