Well, I see not reason not to so I vote to lynch Scoop. I still think their actions were odd. Anyway, the only others I really have any thoughts at the time on would be Dawg, Chill and may be DD.
OMG...is ANYONE going to talk in this game!
Well, since no one is talking..guess I'll talk to myself, I'm bored anyway...so the players this round are...
RB
LG
-Known Mafia
Fire
HN
JC
Chill
Dawg
DD
NJ
JM
Z
[AC] Scoop
Half of these are mafia (minus one)...here are my thoughts at this point
RB...well, he's quite...which for him really doesn't mean to much.
Fire-well, another one that until the game gets going more is hard to read, but at this point I see nothing.
Hooked-not really get much of a vibe from him either...but he is good and could just be playing his cards low this round.
Chill-has my interest, I just do not see the point in voting someone just because you do not think they are going to get lynched.
Dawg-well, I've gone back and forth a bit with his posts...I'm leaning more toward mafia
DD-I think she is playing somewhat questionable. I think her post to me about the "communicating" mafia was odd honestly, she has played enough to know it usually says "part of the communicating mafia".
NJ-said a couple silly things, but I am not getting mafia from her either
Jmax-Very hard to read at this point, since she has been pretty much nonexistent.
Z-Same as Jmax
Scoop-I could be wrong but I am thinking mafia. I think they are pushing hard to make something out of nothing.
With 13 players, I am going with 6 starting out mafia and 7 innocents, I don't think there would be more mafia then innocents to start the game with. We have one already so I am thinking there are most likely 5 left. Of course I could be wrong.
I have one problem with you here.... The split was already dictated by the Mod as 6-6 + 1 Bomber. The SB could play either side and are basically just a wildcard IMO. Why are you confused about this? This is the exact SAME thing that put Dawg on the radar for me. I think I need to review your posts.... care for a pact?