[AC] scoop411;1509828 said:No I was not aimed at you. I was calling G out on her change in posting style and the lack of words between you 2. It just so happened that it is most visable with the interactions she has with you. SO since I was trying to make a point about her posting style and its change I used what was most visable. Now let me ask you is it not strange though how she has stoped calling you huggie and her change in interaction with you? If you think I'm still of interest for what I'm trying to say then by all means vote me, but I'm just trying to get a point about her posting style across.
I'm watching that too, but anyone throwing my name (or varied aliases) out there repeatedly deserves my attention. I'll be ready to vote for G if Chill ends up mafia... I see alot of very subtle distancing there. I'm not at all sure about you, but I don't like my name brought up that much. It gives the scum something to grasp onto and in turn blame you for it. Assuming you're innocent, you'd want to avoid that.
So you want to tell me what was so odd...I mean all I said was you are funny for saying that I was telling someone what to do. You took that and tried to make it into something huge...saying I was freaking out (no not exact wording)...but to me that was very odd.[AC] scoop411;1509789 said:I find something that looked odd to me so my actions are odd that I questioned you? Really G what are you trying to hide and why is hooked seeing things your way? You and Hooked never get along in any game I've read! What is going on now....
OK to continue first off what is with going back to calling him Hooked for the last few games its been Huggie or Huggie bear... Major post change game to game IMO. Second that is a very generic and over used evaluation of Hooked which usually ends up a teammate if you check the records. Please do cause I already did 17 outta bout 20 were teammates when a statement similar to that was used.
Now on to Neon Julie...
Why is she nowhere near on your radar when Ogre protected her so much? I mean really she is nowhere on your radar?
Finally as for me I just want to know in the first post I quoted my stuff was just ODD and thats why you voted me. In the second one though I am trying to make something outta nothing. There is a BIG differance between the 2 IMO.
But hey what do I know I'm just some dumbace villager.:lipssealedsmilie:
[AC] scoop411;1509863 said:Sorry I will avoid it next time. It was just too peculiar for me not to note. On a different note I want to know your thoughts on why the communicating innocents dropped the ball? I personally believe they just plain old screwed up...
So you want to tell me what was so odd...I mean all I said was you are funny for saying that I was telling someone what to do. You took that and tried to make it into something huge...saying I was freaking out (no not exact wording)...but to me that was very odd.
Actually Hooked and I have "gotten along" in a few games, him and I have only been team mates once I think. So really it depends on the game itself as to what happens between us. The last time we were at each others throats so badly...well, we were both innocents. I go back and forth between Hooked and Huggie Oh don't forget HN...I call him that too, all the time...just one of those things. Why you so obsessed with Him and I anyway? You gotta thing for one of us:lipssealedsmilie:
I didn't say NJ was No where near my radar...I said I see nothing from her at this point...big difference there. As far as Ogre appearing to "protect" her, really that is one of the reasons I have her leaning more innocent. I believe he may of been trying to "attach" himself to an innocent. If you read through so many games...you should of seen that too, the bad guys "seeming" to protect someone who is innocent, you see then if/when they are lynched they have someone to fall back on to try and look good.
Well, as for you....you did post odd IMO, which was also the same thing you tried to turn into something. Plain as that, no BIG difference there, the "odd" post you tried to "turn into" something
[AC] scoop411;1509882 said:Big problem with this theory here. There are/were 6 and 6 innocent and mafia. Only 3 and 3 know who they and their teammates are and thats it. SO how would ogre possably know Neon Julie was innocent and not a lone or communicating mafia. See nowhere in the rules do I remember it saying that the Non comms got to know who the comms were. So by that deduction how do you know NJ is or isn't innocent G. Oh wait I think I have an idea on that question... So is that WHO your team investagated in nightfall.
[AC] scoop411;1509789 said:OK to continue first off what is with going back to calling him Hooked for the last few games its been Huggie or Huggie bear... Major post change game to game IMO. Second that is a very generic and over used evaluation of Hooked which usually ends up a teammate if you check the records. Please do cause I already did 17 outta bout 20 were teammates when a statement similar to that was used.
So Scoop...was it 17 out of 20 or was it "about" 17 to 20? See, my problem here is, in the first one you say it with such confidence...you say it IS 17 out of 20 games..then when questioned about it and what games you say "TO BE HONEST" it was about 17 to 20.[AC] scoop411;1509811 said:I think you miss understand. I am not saying they all were you. I went back through the last half the games and when someone doesn't have a good read on someone or when they think someone is playing well the two people usually end up being on the same team. If I caused you any undo stress I am sorry. But to tell you the truth about 17 outta 20 or so that I got to count ended up being that way. And if you want to look it up look at any list from the last 13 or 14 games. And no I didn't keep exact numbers SORRY.