Mafia 38 "the revenge"

[AC] narwhal;1534108 said:
So let me ask why your going to figure out who is who before your gone? Yes there is more mafia to find yet but are you trying to say to watch out for your partner so we lynch them too?? If thats the case just tell us their name and we can lynch them after you.
Click to expand...

Even if I was mafia what good would telling you who my partner is? You wouldn't believe me anyway.
 
[AC] narwhal;1534179 said:
Ok Ogre here is my train of thought on this.
First Ice said the blackmail went to the mafia.
Second at nightfall chill gets saved by it.
Third my thought is there are 2 mafia teams of 2 players at the start. Forth RB is a dead mafia leaving 1 mafia player all alone.
Fifth there is a second team with 2 players still.
Sixth once again chill saved by the blackmail.
Seventh the lone mafia wouldnt know the other 2 mafia.
Eightth This means the lone mafia wouldn't know to save chill
ninth this means it would have to have been his teammate
tenth I may not be right that is the don but close enough
eleventh that means we found both teams IMO

there is my train of thought if you have any more questions please ask

As for distancing from Z wouldn't that be a little TOO obvious?
Click to expand...

I follow and agree up to point 10. 10 and 11 are just guesses. We've found individuals on each team, but not the whole team. OK, if chill is the second team, then we've gotten one from each team (yay us). However, we still have to find the other two.

It's not your logic, but your conclusion I have an issue with.

Chill said:
Yup I would prefer if you lynch Narwhal too.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you would.

I'm leaning toward Z for another mafia.
 
OgreMkV said:
I follow and agree up to point 10. 10 and 11 are just guesses. We've found individuals on each team, but not the whole team. OK, if chill is the second team, then we've gotten one from each team (yay us). However, we still have to find the other two.

It's not your logic, but your conclusion I have an issue with.
[\quote]

Thats fine if you dont agree with me on 10 and 11 because like I said Its IMO. But the good thing is that you understand where i was coming from.
Click to expand...
 
Well, that's a bummer. *lol* Doctors definitely have it tough.

Btw, tied lynches have in the past, resulted in no lynches. I should know! :D


This move to save Chill seems veeerry suspicious. Just like when you're mafia, who do YOU hit? Do you hit the person who's right on your heels, and make them look martyred so that people especially go after who they pointed to? That's a really bad idea. I'm not sure I've seen it doesn't past Game 1 or 2.

WHAT IF... we're being totally hoodwinked here. What if the mafia have done the classic, in the reverse? They apply a blackmail to someone going to be lynched, who they know to be innocent, knowing that people will automatically ASSUME that they put the Save on Chill, to make him look guilty.

I think they are playing a much deeper game then a lot of people are giving them credit for. A vote on Chill right now seems so obvious. I hate feeling like I'm being pushed or manipulated to a vote, (although it is a mob lynching. *lol*)

Personally I'm more apt to see who's jumped on the Chill bandwagon. Alllmmooost like they had they're finger on the button as soon as gameplay resumes.
 
To put simply, I'm thinking a setup went into play here.
 
The difficulty in this situation, is figuring out WHICH team was in possession of the Black Mail, and if they only APPEAR innocent to that team. Whereby, Chill could STILL be the other team member, and still guilty.
 
Careful NJ this line of thought will have someone rushing in to say you're my partner.

If this is deep play it's very deep. I can't see any advantage in framing me and I'm looking very hard.
 
NeonJulie said:
Well, that's a bummer. *lol* Doctors definitely have it tough.

Btw, tied lynches have in the past, resulted in no lynches. I should know! :D


This move to save Chill seems veeerry suspicious. Just like when you're mafia, who do YOU hit? Do you hit the person who's right on your heels, and make them look martyred so that people especially go after who they pointed to? That's a really bad idea. I'm not sure I've seen it doesn't past Game 1 or 2.

WHAT IF... we're being totally hoodwinked here. What if the mafia have done the classic, in the reverse? They apply a blackmail to someone going to be lynched, who they know to be innocent, knowing that people will automatically ASSUME that they put the Save on Chill, to make him look guilty.

I think they are playing a much deeper game then a lot of people are giving them credit for. A vote on Chill right now seems so obvious. I hate feeling like I'm being pushed or manipulated to a vote, (although it is a mob lynching. *lol*)

Personally I'm more apt to see who's jumped on the Chill bandwagon. Alllmmooost like they had they're finger on the button as soon as gameplay resumes.
Click to expand...

To your first point, if Chill were innocent why would they bother saving him? They wouldn't. They would have gained 2 last night. They actively SAVED him.

To your second... that was me and I think you knew that when typing this up. So just to be perfectly clear, as soon as I read that Chill had been saved and we lost our Doc, my finger found the "button".
 
Hooked Newbie said:
To your first point, if Chill were innocent why would they bother saving him? They wouldn't. They would have gained 2 last night. They actively SAVED him.

To your second... that was me and I think you knew that when typing this up. So just to be perfectly clear, as soon as I read that Chill had been saved and we lost our Doc, my finger found the "button".
Click to expand...

I know! I was quite impressed. *lol*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom