I figure the BG's would be similar to stocking to a discus..10 in a 125 is acceptable.
Stocking bluegill is nothing even close to stocking discus. Stocking bluegill is more like stocking oscars.
I figure the BG's would be similar to stocking to a discus..10 in a 125 is acceptable.
not the blue gill around here.. other than they are more active than discus
size wise they are actually smaller than discus but possibly a bit more robust..not anywhere close to an oscar .
I've seen 10" discus but never anything larger than 8-9" bluegills.
actually the dept of wildlife suspects the bluegill in the area are or may not be the same species . research is still ongoing last I heard. having similar characteristics but never reaching the larger potential size.
a 2# bluegill is rare here most often do not reach more than 6".
while I agree bluegill in some regions can and do get much larger. typically here it is not the case.
also keep in mind fish from the wild tend to get larger than captive fish. plenty of documentation regarding that.
H3D that fact that 16" is anywhere is simply NOT true.
the largest caught in this state is 2# 50z.. an exception.