Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

After a long evening at work... release, jbradt is in an introspective mood. It seems that the interactions among these people come in a few definite flavors... :rofl:, :duh:, :bs:, :argue:, and :screwy:. Most of it seems pretty inane. Like the ramble of people honestly trying to make the best of being stuck here.

But there were snitches afoot, and until they were found, somebody was gonna get shanked, and everybody knew it. Most of the other inmates seem pretty calm, but that rb... he was looking for something. Maybe it was a red herring, maybe elvis and bigfoot would bring him one with the smokes. Anything is theoretically possible. He's aweful jumpy though to come out and call out a guy for being a snitch in the first day. That might mean he has something to hide. And somebody has to go, so I vote to shank rbishop.

Nothing personal, rb. I enjoyed our little banter but you were the only one to give me even a small reason not to trust you.

With that particular decision off his mind, he lays down on his cot (back firmly against the wall), and waits to see if he wakes up. :popcorn:
 
ZSandmann said:
Dead man on the Mile, Dead man walking here, Dead man on the line. austinpetemo doesn't know how he got in this place and he wants out. But the tight armed guards drag him along the green mile towards that yellow machine, the Ole Fizzle, the Yellow Express, Mr. Shocky. At 12:01 the lights in the prison dim and everyone observes a moment of silence. The janitor goes into the chair room with a mop, a box of kitty litter, and a bottle of Frebreeze to remove the scent of sweat and urine from the chair. He is listening to Reba's "Night the Light's went out in Georgia" and humming to himself.

austinpetemo is dead, there is a flash of white light and he finds himself in a stark waiting room with only a sign that reads Mafia 41
Click to expand...

LMAO!
 
jbradt said:
After a long evening at work... release, jbradt is in an introspective mood. It seems that the interactions among these people come in a few definite flavors... :rofl:, :duh:, :bs:, :argue:, and :screwy:. Most of it seems pretty inane. Like the ramble of people honestly trying to make the best of being stuck here.

But there were snitches afoot, and until they were found, somebody was gonna get shanked, and everybody knew it. Most of the other inmates seem pretty calm, but that rb... he was looking for something. Maybe it was a red herring, maybe elvis and bigfoot would bring him one with the smokes. Anything is theoretically possible. He's aweful jumpy though to come out and call out a guy for being a snitch in the first day. That might mean he has something to hide. And somebody has to go, so I vote to shank rbishop.

Nothing personal, rb. I enjoyed our little banter but you were the only one to give me even a small reason not to trust you.

With that particular decision off his mind, he lays down on his cot (back firmly against the wall), and waits to see if he wakes up. :popcorn:
Click to expand...

Thank-you for your vote..it is nice to see someone that agrees with me.
 
Still a couple of non-posters, but some intriguing comments starting to come out.

NeonJulie comes out and identifies two people on her radar, and even casts an early vote. Whether you agree or disagree with her posts, the point of interest is that she seems to offer a better case for Dirty Dawg being mafiaish than LadyG. In her opinion, Dirty Dawg has singled out an individual who doesn't deserve to be singled out, yet Dirty Dawg only gets her 'eye'.

On the other hand, LadyG gets a vote, because in Neon's 'world of opposites', LadyG has done something backwards. I'm not even sure what, but seems like a 'gut' reason for a vote.

The fact that she gives a more concrete reason for someone maybe looking mafiaish (Dirty Dawg) and a gut reason for LadyG, but then chooses to vote with her gut is kind of a disconnect for me. Anybody voting their 'gut' ends up on my radar.
NeonJulie said:
I think this is a terrible idea - is it more like a Parolee to want to go after the newer players, or more the strategy of a Lifer? I'm inclined to think this is such a bad idea, it must be the desperate attempt of a Parolee, a Lifer might not even attempt a ploy on the newbs because it would bring bad attention on them. (especially since there really isn't any reason in my mind to single out this person in particular! Just cause he's posting a more than previous newbs? He's probably read people saying the low posters are usually up first on the chopping block - and maybe it's a new player getting into the game and enjoy it.)

That being said, it's so obvious and not good, nothing substantial, that it definitely warrants keeping my eye on you (and you'll agree and probably say 'go ahead people usually do!')

On one hand it does indicate looking towards progressing through the entertainment value of this already great thread, to the task at hand, but picking on that person of all the other scrumptious choices still smells fishy to me.

Like last night's "soup!"

I mean I'm not saying he's innocent, or that I'm sticking up for him, I'm just saying I don't like seeing people target newer persons off the get go, for no reason, (not only because it discourages new people from playing), ah well I've rambled long enough.

Perhaps someone will now come along, count every third letter and draw up some suspicious statement it spells. *lol*
Click to expand...

NeonJulie said:
My last comment for today... let's see if you can all follow this, probably not - cell mates tell the guards all the time they want a new cell, cause I ramble too much...

If Mafia games are Opposite world where the innocent people are more ready to lynch other innocents at the cost of finding the truth, and those who hold back lynching, are considered guilty; then in my opposite world, Lady G's statement that someone else is drawing attention to someone else for no reason, and that stands out to her personally, makes her highly suspicious to me, and unfortunately up first on my List. I could definitely be wrong, it's first night voting, but it looks perfectly set up for someone who was looking for an opportunity to jump on an innocent (who's sticking out a big because they're playing their usual aggressive method), because it COULD normally be reasonable.

I vote to lynch Lady G.

It's not much to go on, and I love her to death so you know it's not personal. It's ironically the same logic she used on me, on the first game, where being innocent at the time, I acted too innocently and it made me look guilty.
Click to expand...


Another player to come to my attention of late is jbradt. Simply for the reason that he claims that rb is the only inmate he doesn't trust at this point.

At this point, I don't trust anyone, and jbradt only mistrusts Bob a little? Why is jbradt so trusting of everyone else, when most others are constantly looking over their shoulder in fear of a beat-down?

Itcould just be the ramblings of a newer player on day one, but this early in the game he seems a little comfy in his cell.
jbradt said:
After a long evening at work... release, jbradt is in an introspective mood. It seems that the interactions among these people come in a few definite flavors... :rofl:, :duh:, :bs:, :argue:, and :screwy:. Most of it seems pretty inane. Like the ramble of people honestly trying to make the best of being stuck here.

But there were snitches afoot, and until they were found, somebody was gonna get shanked, and everybody knew it. Most of the other inmates seem pretty calm, but that rb... he was looking for something. Maybe it was a red herring, maybe elvis and bigfoot would bring him one with the smokes. Anything is theoretically possible. He's aweful jumpy though to come out and call out a guy for being a snitch in the first day. That might mean he has something to hide. And somebody has to go, so I vote to shank rbishop.

Nothing personal, rb. I enjoyed our little banter but you were the only one to give me even a small reason not to trust you.

With that particular decision off his mind, he lays down on his cot (back firmly against the wall), and waits to see if he wakes up. :popcorn:
Click to expand...
 
I went back and did some rereading and noticed this...

IceH2O said:
I was hoping someone would ask these questions by now, would have helped me to push them towards the bottom of the suspect list.

1. There is no mention of how many snitches there are.Are you going to tell us HN or is it secret? I'm guessing with 19 players and everyone having an invest it might be pretty high maybe 6?

2. Can we announce who we are going to investigate? By doing this we can protect from multiple invests on one person.


I could see Chill and Dawg maybe being team mates, its funny they both said the same thing at the same exact time,like they were in a room together and read it. But I'd need to see more then that to place a shank vote.
Click to expand...

The first time I read it I didn't think much of it other than him accusing me of being Chill's teammate. This time I read point #2 and it sent up a few flags. How can one team have multiple invests on the same person? There is a communicating underground team and a communicating snitch team. If they are communicating how do they investigate the same person multiple times unless they want to?

Then I read this...

-Snitches: You were planted by the corrupt Warden to keep an eye out and to inform him each night of who should be beaten to death by the Guards. Before night, the snitches must email or PM me their top 2 choices for a beating. I will randomly choose which is selected. You have the power to investigate once per night to find someone’s true identity. Before night, the snitches must email or PM me their top 2 choices for investigation. Members of the Underground will appear innocent on night 1.
Click to expand...

Isn't the Underground innocent anyway? or is it possible for a member of the underground (the spy or maybe all of them) to be evil but non-communicating with the snitches. That is the only way it would be possible for the same team to do a multiple investigation on the same person without choosing to do so. Did Ice know this?

Maybe HN can shed some light here on the undergrounds innocence.

and maybe Ice could shed some light on his train of thought for question #2...maybe I'm missing something here.
 
Well, it certainly has been an interesting day....not too many signs on who the snitches are at this point but definately some interesting behaviors. Chill & Judge are either crazier than I am or they know somethin that I don't. Walking around singing and drinking like nothin is happening. Weird.
Besides they didn't offer any tequila to me! What does a girl have to do around this place to get a drink? Never mind- not sure I want to know.....:eek:
 
dirtydawg10 said:
I went back and did some rereading and noticed this...



The first time I read it I didn't think much of it other than him accusing me of being Chill's teammate. This time I read point #2 and it sent up a few flags. How can one team have multiple invests on the same person? There is a communicating underground team and a communicating snitch team. If they are communicating how do they investigate the same person multiple times unless they want to?

Then I read this...



Isn't the Underground innocent anyway? or is it possible for a member of the underground (the spy or maybe all of them) to be evil but non-communicating with the snitches. That is the only way it would be possible for the same team to do a multiple investigation on the same person without choosing to do so. Did Ice know this?

Maybe HN can shed some light here on the undergrounds innocence.

and maybe Ice could shed some light on his train of thought for question #2...maybe I'm missing something here.
Click to expand...

Do you not understand? The underground shows innocent night one, vice the snitches knowing who they are on an investigation night one.

Ice was talkin about the innocents all getting an investigation and not doubling up and wasting them on the same person.
 
rbishop said:
Do you not understand? The underground shows innocent night one, vice the snitches knowing who they are on an investigation night one.

Ice was talkin about the innocents all getting an investigation and not doubling up and wasting them on the same person.
Click to expand...

The underground should show up innocent on night 2, 3, 4, 5, etc... I guess it should say PR's will not be revealed on night 1.

Innocents all get an investigation? Where did I miss that. Am I still sleeping this morning?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom