Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

ah heck... I'll put my vote in too, I vote to shank jbradt.... I wasn't sure about it but I am not sure about anyone right now... you however are making me more nervous than others.
 
Bkw1982
Zsandmann
Dangerdoll
IceH2O
Jm1212
Rbishop
Jpappy789
NeonJulie
Lady G
[AC] Tree_Hugger
noodles62
[AC] Doomsday998
Jbradt

BKW, pappy, and Rb have been nonexistant since night fall last night. I figure one of them may have been in solitary but my understanding is that only lasts 12 hours.

We've had more hooey discussion on how to use the invests but once again no real discussion of suspects (my fault as much as anyones).

The only people ringing around in my head right now are LG, noodles, and Doom. noodles I'm willing to let pass for now as its all newbie stuff and I just haven't figured her out yet. I do wish she would go back and carefully read through all the rules though. Doom wasn't even pinging my interest till the pyramid scheme business. I thought we spent the last 48 hours dealing with why we can't say who we investigate??? Last is LG and call it OMGUS if you like but the way she came after me with subtle brushes but no real thrust makes me curious. Also, she didn't show me where I defended BKW instead she tried to bend her arguement to other reasons I looked shady. And then said the same things about Rb. That's hypocracy by definition. I know she isn't the only one that has questioned me, I expect it, but she was the most indirectly direct and now suddenly me, BKW, and DD are a secret team to everyone.

I vote to shank LG.
 
I also want to say that I am still uncomfortable with posting any ideas on who we are going to investigate. The lss the snitches know at this point, the better. I think it would be a foolish mistake to even consider letting them use our gameplay against us.
 
as with yesterday, jbradt has still caught my attention. in addition to being defensive and wanting to gain all of our trust, he has now turned around with this "guilt factor" post and that seems far to shady to me.

I vote to shank jbradt
 
Last edited:
as with yesterday, jbradt has caught my attention. in addition to being defensive and wanting to gain all of our trust, he has now turned around with this "guilt factor" post and that seems far to shady to me.

I vote to shank jbradt
should read like above...forgot i couldnt edit....uh old habbits
 
Lg that is really convoluted logic right there, but you are entitled to your opinion. I agree that BKW looks pretty clear right now though. My only thought is that if you could have worked NJ into that somehow everything would be all lined up for you. Taking out DD, NJ and myself would clear the field for you.



Again, you are correct that I voted for the Doc, and I've said numerous times that this is one of my weak points. I can usually tell when someone is off, but whether it is because they are a baddie or a PR, this is where I need to continue to work. However, your accusations of me last night were that I was defending BKW. Those were the posts I asked you to find, this is not what you've have pulled here, but instead something entirely different.

Could you explain this a little more? How could scoop be "off" as you cannot know their original playing style because of the alias...

First I'm not sure what you mean by this.

2ndly. I have been thinking all day about this and at 1st I was thinking well Bkw is clear.No way he'd try to push that plan knowing he was a goner. Then I started thinking the only way I could see him doing that is to think they were part of the Underground and there was no way they could come back and say Bkw was a snitch.Might be why the sudden turn on Dawg and then he put Chill up for the beat down. Still risky though as the beat down requires putting 2 names in. How would he know that Chill would be chosen.Guess it could be worth the risk though.




Lets start off with paragraph 1 then work down from there.

I agree Noodles is pushing the confused card but not everyone has a good grasp of the game. I am well aware it could be a ploy but I wouldn't feel comfortable voting for her without some kind of proof. Part of my noob reach out plan.

Para 2

I'm on the fence on this one as I stated above. Its a pretty risky move to make because you are not able to know which person sent in will be the actual death.I didn't like the plan to begin with and still don't. It was my reason for voting Bkw to begin with. With more thought I might return there.

Para 3

Well 3 is covered in 2. Pretty risky move.Was it worth taking is what I need to think through.






This is as dumb as Bkws plan and moves you up the ladder quickly. If we announce who we are investigating then the snitches could just send in the beat down on the players they feel is the bigger threat or more likely would cause the most confusion.


You say it eats up 6 investigations. Are you saying there are 6 innocents that can investigate? That leaves 2 underground that can't and now the BIG RED SIGN 5 snitches? How would you know how many of what there is?

I'll let you explain before I place my vote on you.





Just when I think Noodles is just a noob she pulls out the analogy. Hmmm.



Someone actually gets it!

Yes, that is very interesting. I might have to put Doom up there on my list but I'd like to see how they respond first as well.

Clever ploy? :grinyes: Coached, sorry; there you're mistaken.



Good catch jm, I was wondering when someone would bring that up.

Basically, this is a case of a newb getting in a little over his head and needing some space to sort things out. Unfortunately, I got hosed on time today, and this is the only post I'll be able to make before nightfall... so I have to vote now without having had time to really read today's posts. With this in mind, I vote to shank Neon Julie. Basically, this decision is because she asked for it, and from what I understand, she is playing differently than usual. Again, a small reason, but I have very limited time today.

I realize you will all think I took time out to get "coaching" from more experienced players, and if this is the case you can shank me or investigate me... I welcome it as I have nothing to hide.

Now I can't wait to read all the conjecture about this when I get home again!

That line raises big red flags for me...any time someone acts like an apparent mistake is like bait it screams mafia for me.

Bkw1982
Zsandmann
Dangerdoll
IceH2O
Jm1212
Rbishop
Jpappy789
NeonJulie
Lady G
[AC] Tree_Hugger
noodles62
[AC] Doomsday998
Jbradt

BKW, pappy, and Rb have been nonexistant since night fall last night. I figure one of them may have been in solitary but my understanding is that only lasts 12 hours.

We've had more hooey discussion on how to use the invests but once again no real discussion of suspects (my fault as much as anyones).

The only people ringing around in my head right now are LG, noodles, and Doom. noodles I'm willing to let pass for now as its all newbie stuff and I just haven't figured her out yet. I do wish she would go back and carefully read through all the rules though. Doom wasn't even pinging my interest till the pyramid scheme business. I thought we spent the last 48 hours dealing with why we can't say who we investigate??? Last is LG and call it OMGUS if you like but the way she came after me with subtle brushes but no real thrust makes me curious. Also, she didn't show me where I defended BKW instead she tried to bend her arguement to other reasons I looked shady. And then said the same things about Rb. That's hypocracy by definition. I know she isn't the only one that has questioned me, I expect it, but she was the most indirectly direct and now suddenly me, BKW, and DD are a secret team to everyone.

I vote to shank LG.

Z quit skimming, I posted at 8:54 CST this morning. Plus, I wasn't even on your original list...any reason why I am suddenly on your mind???
 
I am only choosing to kepe quiet in respect to asking questions and also to announcing who I wish to investigate. Once an investigation proves positive for a snitch I would like to annnounce my findings but not sure that would be wise and it prob would not be beleived anyway as quite a few of you have doubts about me.
I chose not to "loudly defend myself" as that tactic does not seem to work and only brings a person more in the spotlight, nor do I really wish to sit quietly by while I am accused....tuff spot to be in. I had to stop posting for a while at work and actually do some work, thus my extended silence today.
I have a few people I am unsure of at this point, NJ - same reason as last night. It has been stated repeatedly by seasoned players that she is not playing her usual style. This I cannot confirm first hand but if it is true it is certainly something to look at. I also have BKW and jbradt on my radar...somethings that they have said just don't site right and apparently I am not the only one that thinks so.

Would be nice to get investigation results before lights out, but I am not certain that will be the case. I will try to come to a decision and post a vote soon. I do not want to wait too long..........
 
Lg that is really convoluted logic right there, but you are entitled to your opinion. I agree that BKW looks pretty clear right now though. My only thought is that if you could have worked NJ into that somehow everything would be all lined up for you. Taking out DD, NJ and myself would clear the field for you.

Z since you are around, I asked in my earlier post. Would you please explain the bold line to me?
 
Wow..not as bad as yesterday, but some interesting thoughts. This getting home late and a 24 day makes things a bit tough. Sure wish I could post while at work.

I still don't think it wise to post our investigations. And I am not sure why the discussion continues...I thought it was more than resolved yesterday.

I have come to the realization that Lady G is a more prolific poster and a tad nicer than Neon...but the end results to me, are they could be on the same team.

Glad to see jbrad is back, but I stiil may have an OMGUS vote for them.

Noodles is over doing it big time....worth watching.
 
AquariaCentral.com