Mafia 40 "Life behind bars" The Play

I vote to shank RB

Dooms vote for RB with no reasoning and NJs vote and post really makes me think they might be part of his team. I think they jumped on because they thought it was going to be a runaway train and getting on early would avoid them a late vote looking at. I think if its a close vote between RB and someone else they will jump to the other player to save RB.

Still have a retraction if someone can prove to me that RB is telling the truth in which case I'll jump to Tree or if someone can verify Noddles I'll jump to Bkw.

I agree here, although...Tree is one that just hasn't rang any bells to me, I would have a hard time believing them to be snitch. Now, if RB does go tonight and is innocent, Tree would be one to go after next day. Right now, RB, NJ and BKW cause me the most concern really.
 
I vote to shank RB

Dooms vote for RB with no reasoning and NJs vote and post really makes me think they might be part of his team. I think they jumped on because they thought it was going to be a runaway train and getting on early would avoid them a late vote looking at. I think if its a close vote between RB and someone else they will jump to the other player to save RB.

Still have a retraction if someone can prove to me that RB is telling the truth in which case I'll jump to Tree or if someone can verify Noddles I'll jump to Bkw.

I agree here, although...Tree is one that just hasn't rang any bells to me, I would have a hard time believing them to be snitch. Now, if RB does go tonight and is innocent, Tree would be one to go after next day. Right now, RB, NJ and BKW cause me the most concern really.

Unfortunately I won't be on at nightfall tonight, but if anyone 'confirms' what rb is saying, that'd be one of his partners.

The 4 UDs on night 1 have apparently put the population in a tight spot, and the snitches should be able to play pretty boldly from here on out. Think about it. By accusing someone solely based on the investigation there's nothing for someone to defend against. It totally comes down to who you trust.

Once again, the multiple UDs come into play, as with only two days behind us the innocents are put into the position of having to hit scum tonight to stay alive. The snitches know this, and are likely to play accordingly.
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;1578810 said:
Apparently what really cracks you up, rb, is trying to confuse the heck out of the population with your votes. Why is that? Most folks are trying pretty hard to find scum, and you're pitching 'odd' votes out there just to gum up the works.


From Day 1, you mention toward nightfall that you're leaning toward jbradt, Chill or Dawg for your vote.



Then you ask Hooked Newbie for an updated vote count.



Then after getting the count (and seeing where the votes are) you vote for NJ, JUST FOR FUN! For whose fun? The general population? NeonJulie's? Nope, wasn't fun for anyone but you and your snitches.



Day 2, toward evening you post your intent to shank Doomsday, and give a reason.



Doomsday counters with an OMGUS.



And you counter with this one, telling the person you just voted for (and gave a reason for doing so) to be ready to jump with you onto someone else. Huh?



Here's you getting all excited that you're going to be able to cause some confusion at nightfall again.



And here you go... A vote for LG with NO reason. How exciting! Here's the confusion that you couldn't wait for. To top it off, you encourage the person you voted for previously to change their vote, too.



When you're accused of looking scummy, because of your voting record, you reply with the following. I guess you're saying that because you always play scummy that people shouldn't view your actions as scummy. Yeah right, nice defense.



In searching thru your posts, there was something else that intrigued me about your play this game. You've appeared to be really standoffish with some of the folks you regularly mix it up with early on.

Usually you mix it up with LG, DD, Ice and some of the more seasoned vets early on, but not this game for some reason. Even LG mentioned how nice you were being nice to her.

Instead you spar back and forth with the newbie, jbradt, and seem to get a little bent out of shape when he fights back. Why so edgy, and why are you shying away from those players more likely to catch you?



I vote to shank rbishop

I know that rb is a snitch based on his accusation of me, but hopefully the posts above will show others, as well. I would encourage everyone to read back through the thread carefully, we have to hit scum tonight, or it's likely over.


Boy, talk about being defensive for being silent most the game....

:grinno:
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;1578810 said:
Apparently what really cracks you up, rb, is trying to confuse the heck out of the population with your votes. Why is that? Most folks are trying pretty hard to find scum, and you're pitching 'odd' votes out there just to gum up the works.


From Day 1, you mention toward nightfall that you're leaning toward jbradt, Chill or Dawg for your vote.



Then you ask Hooked Newbie for an updated vote count.



Then after getting the count (and seeing where the votes are) you vote for NJ, JUST FOR FUN! For whose fun? The general population? NeonJulie's? Nope, wasn't fun for anyone but you and your snitches.



Day 2, toward evening you post your intent to shank Doomsday, and give a reason.



Doomsday counters with an OMGUS.



And you counter with this one, telling the person you just voted for (and gave a reason for doing so) to be ready to jump with you onto someone else. Huh?



Here's you getting all excited that you're going to be able to cause some confusion at nightfall again.



And here you go... A vote for LG with NO reason. How exciting! Here's the confusion that you couldn't wait for. To top it off, you encourage the person you voted for previously to change their vote, too.



When you're accused of looking scummy, because of your voting record, you reply with the following. I guess you're saying that because you always play scummy that people shouldn't view your actions as scummy. Yeah right, nice defense.



In searching thru your posts, there was something else that intrigued me about your play this game. You've appeared to be really standoffish with some of the folks you regularly mix it up with early on.

Usually you mix it up with LG, DD, Ice and some of the more seasoned vets early on, but not this game for some reason. Even LG mentioned how nice you were being nice to her.

Instead you spar back and forth with the newbie, jbradt, and seem to get a little bent out of shape when he fights back. Why so edgy, and why are you shying away from those players more likely to catch you?



I vote to shank rbishop

I know that rb is a snitch based on his accusation of me, but hopefully the posts above will show others, as well. I would encourage everyone to read back through the thread carefully, we have to hit scum tonight, or it's likely over.


Not true, you lie....you are a snitch, so you know I am innocent....:screwy:
 
Vote Tally:

[AC] Tree_Hugger- 1 : rbishop
bkw1982- 1 : noodles62
rbishop- 3 : Lady G, [AC] Doomsday998, [AC] Tree_Hugger

Night in 4 hour & 15 minutes.


Look at that, tree hugger is the 3rd one on me....:grinyes:
 
how did this bcome a sticky????
 
Or we might be guessing, and be wrong and he ends up being innocent after all - he's had a few unjustified lynches in the past. I hope this isn't the case this time.


if I get shanked it will add another unjustified one to the list, Neon.

With all the UDs on night one of innocents, regardless of the number of snitches we started with, they can easily sway the vote.
 
ok g you need to rethink ur line of reasoning.

some facts:
there have been 8 innocents removed
the prison hve lost 7 investigations
there are 11 players left.
Worst case, there are 6 prisoners 5 snitches(this being the worst case)

This is a game of information, the more you have the better chance of winning. The snitches know everything about the general population, but the general population know nothing bout them.

If everyone stays silent on their invest and they get hit we loose another piece of info. If ppl come out and say who is innocent, even if its snitches, there is another piece of info.

Sitting and waiting to me is just a waste, if i didnt know you were innocent you would get my vote.

The staying silent only works if the prison didnt loose so many ppl so fast, even though its only day 3 its really like its day 5.

I hope tht makes sense, and you understand what im saying.


ok - right here bkw states that 7 invests have been used. I went back and counted who "announced" their invests and unless I missed some only 4 people did - me, rb, lg & ice....where did he come up with 7? were the other 3 from snitches that did not disclose that they had done an invest? He also conveniently let us know that LG was an innocent.....Come on people, I have a feeling that the snitches are making a case against rb to get him out of the way and some of the innocents are buying into it cause of bob's playing style this game.......I hope this all makes sense.....i will go back and look again...........
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;1579614 said:
Unfortunately I won't be on at nightfall tonight, but if anyone 'confirms' what rb is saying, that'd be one of his partners.

The 4 UDs on night 1 have apparently put the population in a tight spot, and the snitches should be able to play pretty boldly from here on out. Think about it. By accusing someone solely based on the investigation there's nothing for someone to defend against. It totally comes down to who you trust.

Once again, the multiple UDs come into play, as with only two days behind us the innocents are put into the position of having to hit scum tonight to stay alive. The snitches know this, and are likely to play accordingly.


And they are, with you in the lead...
 
AquariaCentral.com