Mafia #43 Bio Badlands #2

Lady G,

If you were evil, what was your reason (or would have been) to hit DD?
 
Rosita,

Now that you have had time to read the thread, and your game life has been spared - how are you going to help the town find evil?

Does anything stick out to you? Do you find anyone suspicious at all? Will you vote for no one at nightfall again?

Why shouldn't I or others vote for you?
 
ZS,

You are defending your vote on 3L and really think he was evil?

In almost every game there has been a wild-eyed out of control newbatard and in almost every instance they have been innocent. The evil newbies always get help from their teamates, but the innocent newbs have only this thread to figure out what is going on.

I can see voting for 3L because he was bad for the town with his play style - if he had not changed. Which he might have been able to change. I for one would have voted for him on day two, if his conduct continued and if he failed to vote for an evil.

What do you think of the evils choice of DD? Were you expecting to maybe get hit? Who would have you hit?
 
Ah, jl, so glad I finished reading the days' postings only to end with your gauntlet thrown.
Absence has been due to important reasons, no more shall be spoken.
It seems that people are not only in fear of being voted out this second day, after the casualties of the first, but are posting a lot of deflections. It's "he said, she said, I said, and this is what we all meant." Interpretations of language versus true meanings---so clever we think we are.
I am seeing some obvious, sinister players who cloak themselves in sweetness or pseudo-knowledge.
I am keeping my eyes and mind/senses on a few--which IS the same as several. And just because someone is a low poster on their first game (I no longer consider myself a newbie here after almost 2 years) doesn't mean things will heat up. You are forewarned, yet not forearmed.
Mhuaahahahaha . . . . gack ack ack.
 
What happened on day one is something. Things arent always what they seem,just becuase someone is playing evil doesnt mean they are and usually the people that are acting abnormally "nice" may become suspicious.


-CT
 
johnlarson66 said:
ZS,

You are defending your vote on 3L and really think he was evil?

In almost every game there has been a wild-eyed out of control newbatard and in almost every instance they have been innocent. The evil newbies always get help from their teamates, but the innocent newbs have only this thread to figure out what is going on.

I can see voting for 3L because he was bad for the town with his play style - if he had not changed. Which he might have been able to change. I for one would have voted for him on day two, if his conduct continued and if he failed to vote for an evil.

What do you think of the evils choice of DD? Were you expecting to maybe get hit? Who would have you hit?
Click to expand...

JL bringing the questions! :goldfish:

Yup, I will defend my vote for 3L because he was over the top and distracting, he constantly referred to other games and I figured he had been coached to study up, he seemed to know us all better than a newbie should, and back to point one he was distracting.

I am always glad to survive a night hit, so yes the hit on DD is odd. Seems like they either wanted to discredit anything 3L said or completely through us off. Also, as I said earlier this pick makes me think Dr. Gene may be a newer less experienced player, because I picked up nothing from DD that would have given me a PR vibe. "If" I were an evil I would have Hit HN or you, JL, because HN is playing low (and I always take out HN :D ) and you are good at detectiving (not a word). I'll also toss in Mad because he is good at reading me.
 
rosita said:
And you betcha sweet patootie, I shall vote for someone tonight.
Click to expand...

Maybe you can explain the whole gaunlet thing.

Until then, care to share with the rest of the town your thoughts? I asked some pretty simple questions:

Does anything stick out to you?

Do you find anyone suspicious at all?

Will you vote for no one at nightfall again?

Why shouldn't I or others vote for you?

You answered one out of four. Are you running for mayor? Tell us your suspects. Why have the town wait until just before nightfall.
 
Ctenopoma said:
What happened on day one is something. Things arent always what they seem,just becuase someone is playing evil doesnt mean they are and usually the people that are acting abnormally "nice" may become suspicious.


-CT
Click to expand...

CT, are you playing evil or acting abnormally nice?

Why did you hit DD? If you had to do it over who would have you hit instead?
 
rosita said:
Ah, jl, so glad I finished reading the days' postings only to end with your gauntlet thrown.
Absence has been due to important reasons, no more shall be spoken.
It seems that people are not only in fear of being voted out this second day, after the casualties of the first, but are posting a lot of deflections. It's "he said, she said, I said, and this is what we all meant." Interpretations of language versus true meanings---so clever we think we are.
I am seeing some obvious, sinister players who cloak themselves in sweetness or pseudo-knowledge.
I am keeping my eyes and mind/senses on a few--which IS the same as several. And just because someone is a low poster on their first game (I no longer consider myself a newbie here after almost 2 years) doesn't mean things will heat up. You are forewarned, yet not forearmed.
Mhuaahahahaha . . . . gack ack ack.
Click to expand...

Those obvious, sinister players would be the ones we're looking for. Care to share? In addition to identifying and voting for those who you find sinister, part of the game consistes of sharing information to persuade others to see your point of view.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom