![[AC] C-note](/forums/data/avatars/s/83/83156.jpg?1431345517){kind=avatar}
Dawg, you mention that maelstrom's vote for DD, without a reason, makes DD seem more innocent to you. I'm assuming then that you think maelstrom's move was pretty scummy. Is that assumption correct?
Mafia 46: In the Dark
- Thread starter IceH2O
- Start date
Dawg, you mention that maelstrom's vote for DD, without a reason, makes DD seem more innocent to you. I'm assuming then that you think maelstrom's move was pretty scummy. Is that assumption correct?
Agreed that voting early can sometimes prove useful. People need to remember that in this particular game, though, that we're only allowed ONE retraction.
That was.......uncalled for, what exactly might he be covering up for? And more importantly who is he covering up for. Dangerdoll to me has really not made any headway whether she is mafia or innocent, unless they know something we don't.
Well, just read over everything again and there's really nothing but a lot of hooey about Lucky's error and his defense of that error and bickering between Cnote and Gunslinger as well as Rich and Gunslinger...could be distancing but then again could just be chatter to get the ball rolling.
malestrom's vote of DD, really early w/ no explaination is a little concerning, that's for sure. Would like to hear the reasoning for that vote. I personally will hold off on my vote as we only get 1 retraction and I would like to be a little more certain before I throw a vote out there....well, as certain as you can be on day one....
malestrom's vote of DD, really early w/ no explaination is a little concerning, that's for sure. Would like to hear the reasoning for that vote. I personally will hold off on my vote as we only get 1 retraction and I would like to be a little more certain before I throw a vote out there....well, as certain as you can be on day one....
Dangerdoll
Global Moderator
OgreMkV
Father of Earth's Next Emperor
Unless Maelstrom is playing a really aggressive, strong mafia, then IMO, they are most likely innocent. There is almsot no way that a mafia would pull something that painfully obvious on day one. There's no need, there's no reason, and it's not LadyG, so we can rule out nuts.
However, that doesn't automatically clear DD though. I have no reason to say she is mafia, but a vote against her sure as heck doesn't make her innocent.
However, that doesn't automatically clear DD though. I have no reason to say she is mafia, but a vote against her sure as heck doesn't make her innocent.
![[AC] maelstrom](/forums/data/avatars/s/83/83901.jpg?1431345518){kind=avatar}
Well as far as I can see I could just as easy start calling out people for not putting out votes and for posting up useless no content posts and even for saying that my vote makes DD look innocent. For a start there are two mafia tonight and I don't know how many players so statistically you just think about it.
mostlycichlids
Cichlid Specialist
Funny you point out mafia doing very well...is this an indication you are an innocent and suspect DD to be mafia? Or are you mafia trying to stay safe? Sounds fishy to me and with little to nothing to go on very weird.[AC] maelstrom;1811871 said:
[AC] C-note;1811974 said:
I think that by voting without stating reasons is scummy...yes. Because the idea of the game is to get ideas out there so we can help the town figure out who the evils are. It seems to me like someone starting a train.
Good point Ogre. I actually see it the other way due to no reasoning behind it. If I had only one retraction my vote would be based on some sort of reasoning. I know it is day one and it may not be sustantial but there must be something to cause the vote.
No one said it cleared DD or made her innocent. I said the vote has DD leaning more innocent for me.
