Mafia 46: In the Dark

I am sorry i just dont have a good feeling about Ogre, to me he seems to be very deceptive. Looking for some better evidence now just got nerves about the time.
 
Interesting developments...


I've all but said that I think gunslinger is innocent. I never have voted for and I don't plan to vote for him. I am pointing out things to people... even though they won't listen.

The mafia are getting a free ride tonight.

Just look where I'm voting and I'm perfectly happy with that vote at this time. We'll see what happens tonight.
Ogre, interesting to see that you think Gunslinger is innocent. Even though you're now claiming 'trap', you did work at getting the ball moving on Gun and then backed out. Should Gun go tonight and come up innocent, you'll have some explaining to do tomorrow...even though you're now claiming you think he's innocent.

Here's some things you said regarding Gun earlier today:
The mafia are at their best when they have someone else to twist. For example, Gunslinger would make a great mafia candidate. No one is posting anything about him at all. However, he has a ready target in Maelstrom so anything that he (gunslinger) says about maelstrom is going to be something that everyone else agrees with.

At this time, I'd like to point out that no one has even mentioned that gunslinger has at least once been caught saying things that had no basis in reality (about me and caught by me), but everyone is following him.

You know...

I'm really hesitant to vote for gunslinger, but I really want to. A vote for him goes against my thinking, but I really want to... sigh.
 
Good points c note
 
[AC] maelstrom;1813242 said:
Oh come on G. Does anyone still think that this question of why I voted for Dangerdoll is live ? Ok so you've basically contributed nothing to the game so far but bringing this one up - sheesh.



Beg to differ depending on when. You either get it or you don't.




Yeah yeah yeah. I didn't answer the question yawn read the thread G.



No it was not. Thankfully at least some other players have thought about it a little.



If you were in fact reading my posts you could not have taken this conclusion from them. I don't suppose you bothered to read the list I posted of where I was on each player earlier in the day.




I quoted the start up post by Ice to get a list of players for my list (where is anyone elses list). It was posted by Ice. So it said "originally posted by Ice". You could have worked that out by the way it said "originally posted by Ice" and the way when you clicked it it brought you back to the rules. Do you get it. ???



Obvious scummy play - nonsense. My vote was not scummy. Never actually answering the one question - nonsense. Read the thread. Dancing around it - you are kidding me right I mean lol I danced around nothing. Just said I wasn't giving a reason for voting Dangerdoll. That is not avoiding anything. Calling others out for not answering questions - also nonsense. Dirtydawg was slow to say whether he thought my vote was scummy. That's all. That is a long way off calling anybody out never made "others

Anyway, that's three votes on me. In terms of trying to help the town, as far as I'm concerned I've put more effort in than anyone and I'm comfortable taking the heat for that. Think about it.
Oh, I read the thread alright, and unlike you pulled up posts and gave my reasons for my vote...sorry if they were later then you would of liked or whatever...and yeah, as far as the post being "obvious" as to why it said originally posted for Ice just whatever, since you were the one who did it...yep it may of been obvious to you but to me...nope it wasn't and nope I still really don't get it but oh well.
It wasn't nonsense that you "called others out for not answering questions" you did it.
[AC] maelstrom;1813409 said:
By the way, I am really taken aback at the lack of lists being put up by the town in circumstances where the mafia can turn people. This is fundamental to being able to track changes in players who've been turned. I think we should get on it people.
Lists on day one are pretty much pointless really, how many times have you seen ppl called out because they put a list out on day one? I think maybe you just want to see who would be best for you to "pick" or whatever. Especially, in a build a team game..after day one, yep I think lists are a good thing. They do help in many ways, but not really do much on day one IMO.
Ummm... I thought it was obvious that he's been pushing for Mael (first vote on Mael). Now mael has three times as many votes as anyone else... wow that sounds worse than it actually is. Mael has three votes and three others have one each.

Sounds like following to me.

Plus, many seem to think that mael is scummy for his early vote for you... or at least extrememly interesting because of it.
Personally, I didn't see anyone "following" Gun. I saw Mael looking the scummiest and getting votes because of it, but I don't think I really saw anyone voting him because of Gun.
[AC] maelstrom;1813970 said:
Oh yeah, that and mafia in the minority like day 1 here tend to hide their votes on throw away non lynch candidates, so they can't be blamed for an innocent lynch, or on each other, so later in the game they can claim to have always been on such and such when that person is outed.
Yep, the mafia sure do try to blend their vote in, or vote others that wont be voted...BTW, where is your vote???
Post 321 forgot to add

I retract my vote on mael, and vote to lynch DD
Nice, after about 4 pages of players calling Mael out for voting with no reason (you being one of them) you go and vote DD with no reason??:headshake2:
Although there wasn't a train against you(mael), I was going to vote anyway because I felt a full flush of hostility towards you. Not going to lie, my biggest fear as a noob, was being voted out the first round, so while trying to please everyone, and trying to discover who holds the positions as mafia, I let my fear of being misread get out of hand and that is what caused me to feel trainish before the train had ever been started.

I changed my vote not only because I mistrusted DD fully but because I started to realize that what you said and did was alot like what I did my first game, with my intentions being the same. And thought that the majority of people didn't understand what you were getting at. I think you needed another chance as do all other outcasted innocents.

And thanks for clarifying, I now exactly who you are ;)
So what did DD do that made you "mistrust" her???
I VOTE TO LYNCH OGREMkV
Hmmm, another no reason vote?

I am tempted to change my vote to Lucky, his post really seem off to me after so much attention about Maels no reason vote on DD, he comes in and votes the same way???
 
After some considerable thought, I am going to place my vote, which has for the record been taken off once and can't be again. I vote to lynch dirtydawg.
 
I am not sure how I feel about Orge right now. He has explained his whole mafia tell statement and he seems to have many valid points. I also know he is not that good at being bad.

I am also very uneasy about MC's multi colored and sized post and their proclaimation of DD's innocence and their reasons for it. I am assuming MC has played before, but am unsure.

My vote is on Orge and it appears others feel the same. I am not sure if that is a good thing or not.
 
If you're looking for reasons for my actual vote tonight I've largely already given them.
 
On the note that my hunch would put Ogre tied in votes I RETRACT MY VOTE ON ORGE
 
^ why
 
FINALLY...I am done reading! You guys sure posted a lot considering we have zero information! You guys almost made me UD :p

Because that took so long, this will have to be the short version...

I am going to throw Lucky, Gunslinger and Mael off my list as potential suspects. They have made way too much racket and drawn way too much attention to themselves, which doesn't seem very Mafia like to me.

I also feel that people who don't post a lot tend to draw attention to themselves, so for now I am eliminating: Jpap, LG, and Jarred.

C-Notes original "...lynch some mafia" quote at the very beginning was, imo, an innocent shout. So, I have my eye on them.

But, there really is no information out there, and this day was filled with the most inane arguments. So, I feel I cannot narrow down my list anymore...so I am going to roll...because that's really the only fair way to do this. My "gut feelings" always prove wrong, lol.

Therefore, I vote to lynch MostlyCichlids.
 
AquariaCentral.com