Mafia 46: In the Dark

[OgreMkV]

Regarding the counts, we'll need to wait and see if anyone ends up not posting....there's the issue with a player dying if they're recruited by both teams, and the team death penalty if someone from the opposite team is targeted. Also, some of the innocents in the Night 1 die-off could have been targeted by either team for recruitment (Gunslinger, Jarred, Jbradt). Could definitely mess with the numbers for the communicators.

I think Ice would tell us the result of any death. whether it be random, UD or communicating team.

I'm not sure though.

Hmmm... ladyG and lucky?

 

[IceH2O]

I think Ice would tell us the result of any death. whether it be random, UD or communicating team.

I'm not sure though.

Hmmm... ladyG and lucky?

Might want to read the rules

 

[mostlycichlids]

Lucky, a minute or two past nightfall you retracted your vote on LG and hopped on Ogre. You said you'd explain later. I'd be interested in hearing your explanation.

Wow I would be interested in an explanation too...Seems like possible communicating Mafia move to save dawg.

 

[Lady G]

YESSSSS!!! Good one guys :thm:

Stinks we lost Cj, but soooo very good to get a Mafia!!!!

Yikes as I reread the thread this really puts Lady G on the radar for me. Its almost like "I often vote wrong seriously its not my fault" but in this game there are eh lets see now NO PR's. And Lady G cannot be confusing communicating innocent with power roles because she differentiates between them herself in her post. I added Rich to my suspects from last night, and now due to this and I might add her other bs posts I also add Lady G. Currently voting Dawg, my main man for tonight, subject to developments and what all else anyone has to say.

Well, Mael..IMO the CI's are our PRs in this game. If that is what bothers you about me then well, what can I say except how lame an excuse.

 

[Lady G]

Well, nothing has really happened to change my opinion on Noodles, Lucky or Rich. Orge...well, for the time being and until more is posted I am leaning him more innocent. As for C-note...I think I would have to lean them innocent as well unless he and Dawg were doing one heck of a distancing tactic. Same would go for Mael IMO.

Regarding the counts, we'll need to wait and see if anyone ends up not posting....there's the issue with a player dying if they're recruited by both teams, and the team death penalty if someone from the opposite team is targeted. Also, some of the innocents in the Night 1 die-off could have been targeted by either team for recruitment (Gunslinger, Jarred, Jbradt). Could definitely mess with the numbers for the communicators.

Yep, good point.

I think Ice would tell us the result of any death. whether it be random, UD or communicating team.

I'm not sure though.

Hmmm... ladyG and lucky?

Hmmm....yes?? Did you have a question for me or were you just missing me and needing to say my name?

 

[OgreMkV]

Well, nothing has really happened to change my opinion on Noodles, Lucky or Rich. Orge...well, for the time being and until more is posted I am leaning him more innocent. As for C-note...I think I would have to lean them innocent as well unless he and Dawg were doing one heck of a distancing tactic. Same would go for Mael IMO.


Yep, good point.


Hmmm....yes?? Did you have a question for me or were you just missing me and needing to say my name?

Just missing you... since I'm not picking on noods anymore

Ice, your rules are nuts... sigh

 

[[AC] C-note]

Rich, here's a timeline of events that took place on Day 2, that I'm interested in.

8:45 am yesterday, you note that I seem innocent to you

C-note seems innocent to me right now, we shall see.

1:02 pm yesterday, you note again that I am innocent and express interest in knowing who my suspects are.

C-note has been on everyone. Seems to be doing what an innocent towns person would do, try to get people to speak to see if he can pry lose that important fact that will help us come to a good decision. I would like to know what his list is currently.

4:48 pm yesterday, I make you aware of my #1 suspect when I vote for Dawg (again).

I vote to lynch Dawg

7:33 pm yesterday, you appear to be attempting to discredit my logic for going after Dawg.

C-note is on dawg buit I dont quite follow the logic. I have only played one other time but i dont see how is actions would influence a vote on mael by saying DD.

9:22 pm yesterday, you mention thin logic (I'm assuming you're referring to me again), and now you've got me leaning mafia. You also make a wishy-washy comment about seeming unsure about Dawg.

Wow we have votes and accusations flying everywhere. Some pretty thin logic but we have not all that much to go on either.

I suspect or feel mafia leanings for ogre and c-note but that just may be they are the most active.

Ogre and Noodles are on each other but they have been since almost post one. Maybe this is ruse to make us not pay that much attention to them.

Lucky and dawg have been strong in their opinions. Again is this tactics or personalities.

I must think some more on this.

Now this morning, I point out the inconsistency regarding how I had gone from looking pretty innocent in your mind to quickly being leaned mafia.

Do you see the inconsistencies, Rich? And these are all from the same day (yesterday). Interesting to note that DD named myself and Ogre as suspects, and then you seem to do a complete 180 and do the same...

What gives?

You respond that it was because I was talked about alot, as I was active and questioning.

I was observing that you and Ogre were suspects or talked about a lot because you were both active and questioning.

A couple of things Rich... from the time you posted your confirmation that I still appeared innocent at 1:02 pm (post 468) to the time you leaned me mafia at 9:22 pm (post 532) I really hadn't been talked about much by anyone other than Dawg. DD made a mention of me as a suspect, but didn't say much to back that up. Maybe I missed a comment or two, but that's really about it. I definitely don't think my affiliation was a major topic of conversation for most of the town. So it seems strange you claim that my 'being talked about a lot' swayed your opinion enough for me to move from a strong innocent to mafia in a pretty short time.

So what might have swayed your opinion so quickly? It sure looks to me like my vote for Dawg might have been the factor.

You expressed interest in knowing my suspects when you called me innocent (again) in post 468. Once I voted for Dawg in post 493, though, in post 514 you appeared to be trying to discredit the logic behind my vote. Then in 532 you appear to be going after my logic again, and now have me listed as mafia.

It sure looks like you might have been trying to cover for Dawg, Rich. Care to comment?

 

[[AC] maelstrom]

Go town.

Bye bye dawg I like being right.

 

[Lady G]

Ok, guys/gals I am thinking outloud here starting with the list of players and what we know about some.

Noodles
Ogre
Mostlycichlids
Rich
Dawg-mafia-lynched
DD
Jbradt-innocent-UD
Opi
Lucky
Cj-innocent-random act of violence
JL
Jarred-innocent-UD
LG
C-note
Mael
Guns-innocent-lynched

Night one votes...
DD-(1)-Lucky

Ogre-(2) Gun, CJ

Mael-(2)-LG, Dawg

Noodles-(1)-Ogre

Dawg-(1)-Cnote

Gun-(3)-Noodles, Rich, DD

Lucky-(1)-MC

MC-(1)-Opi

CJ-(1)-John

Night two votes..

Ogre-(4)-MC, Noodles, Cj, Dawg

Dawg-(4)-C-note, Mael, Ogre, Opi

Noodles-(2)-LG, Rich

MC-(1)-John

LG-(1)-Lucky

C-note-(1)-DD

I am going to start a new post with some thoughts, as this one is getting pretty long

 

[Lady G]

Looking back at nightfalls, we have Lucky with a lone vote both nights, along with John. The votes were so spread out night one, it is hard to get anything from it..but I would bet those on Guns were innocent (at least at the time). With the votes that spread out the Mafia had no pressure at all so I am sure they voted on ones with no risk of being lynched.

John really has done nothing to make me to uneasy about him, but of course he hasn't said much either ( I know I haven't either) at this time I really haven't seen him as a threat.

Lucky on the other hand, night one votes DD (first with no reason) even AFTER everyone was all over Mael for doing the same thing. Night two, he votes me with the reason "to make ppl talk". Later he posts how he didn't want a train on me because of his vote, because ppl were starting to talk about me, leaving his vote though. Then at nightfall, after some pressure to switch because it was a wasted vote...he switches his vote which would of broke the tie and sealed the lynch on Ogre, although his vote switch was to late.

Somthing is definately not sitting well with me about Lucky he has unsettled me throughout the game and I have a feeling he was a team mate of Dawgs.