:rofl:
Thanks for making me chuckle, scumbag.
I try to help boss.
:rofl:
Thanks for making me chuckle, scumbag.
Which direction should we go then? Who's scummy to you? Aside from me obviously. Who should we spend the next 23 hours peering into?
How about we let newly arrived MC, Ogre, and Red go at it for a while I am spent right now. I've made my case, go back and pull my posts or reread or something while I apply some Head On directly to my forehead, Head On directly to my forehead, Head On directly to my forehead.
Pulling a Wood?
And yes Devil's Advocate is scummy when you are suggesting voting a suspected INNOCENT just to try and flush out Mafia. They aren't dumb and I'm sure they can see through your masterful trap.
I'm thinking, it actually might be safe for the innocent journalist to come out. The innocent team gets a hit tonight, they'd hate to hit the journalist by accident in case he/she is acting scummy to avoid suspicion.
It would also help to know which headline can be trusted. Just a thought really. I'll probably catch slack for this.
I'm gonna take my dog to the park, and likely regret this post when I get home.
Since you're gonna turtle up like rich, I think we have to.
keep it clean buddy. :duh:
Let's not forget the other suggestion Zaffy made previous to that one.
Think about it, Zaffy. If you were on the communicating innocent team, do you think for a moment that you'd suggest the townie journalist speak up to reveal who they are? As a non-communicating innocent, would you then make that same suggestion? In both cases... no.
It's the mafia side who wants to know who that player is. And if we've now eliminated a place for you on the innocent side, where do you think that puts you after that post... hmm?