What I said is also different than what you said. The whole point was you didn't sound so joking about Rich...you specifically said if you were the mod you might give Rich the role and that you were "game" if you didn't find another suspect. That's not random at all (as I have said), and not really a joke either since you there could be something behind the theory, even though you continue to play it off as such. I'm confused what is so joking about joining in lynching a player that didn't do anything concrete to merit the votes. You alluded to that your final vote would be there ("if push comes to shove") and since you wanted to join in the fun, I assume that means you wanted to join in with other people who may have voted for Rich? Why would you want to jump on a train as a joke, Ice? Unless you're keeping to your story (that the whole post was a joke) please explain what exactly you did mean so I don't make the mistake of believing what I just said if it is not correct.
You're also exaggerating what I said. It was one post, after my initial vote, where I questioned your logic. I have yet to use it against you yet you say I jumped on you...I get a sense that you're almost trying to blow this out of proportion.
All that post said was if I didn't find a suspect worthy of lynching that my random pick would be Rich on the off chance that Dawg did use his name as a cover for a Mafia Boss. Day 1 is as random as it gets if there is no clear choice so why not Rich for that reason?
If I had wanted to vote Rich I would have voted then. I didn't and instead looked for a real suspect, or actually had 1 fall into my lap.