so can you give a single reason that a SCUM person (noods) wouldn't vote for you and give themself a 50 / 50 shot at living the day through?
Mafia 66: Farmers versus the Railroad - the play
- Thread starter johnlarson66
- Start date
so can you give a single reason that a SCUM person (noods) wouldn't vote for you and give themself a 50 / 50 shot at living the day through?
What about the person/people that didn't vote for Noods? 5 people still alive that didn't and since we know that the scum team can only have 4 people at most then you can't assume that only the people who you voted with are innocent. Why should I believe you over Lab? The lack of anything until you were in risk of dying doesn't help sway me towards your direction.
But then wouldn't there be 5 RRO now with the 2 farmers that were turned if there were 3 initial scum and none of the UDs were scum? And 5 RRO with only 10 of us left means the scum would have won. So there's gotta be only 4 of them.
Exactly. If Noods had voted Coler then she easily could have given herself a 50/50 chance of living and a 50/50 chance of an innocent dieing. They could have had 5 people today and won.
You're forgetting that Noods died.
4 + 2 recruits - 1 lynched - 1 Ud'd = 4 left.
3 + 2 recruits - 1 lynched = 4 left.
I disagree that the lines are as clearly drawn in the sand as you are suggesting JPap. Why would all scum end up on one side or the other. I'm guessing there are a few scum on each. The interesting thing is how you conveniently left off the people who voted for Wiz. Is that because it's who you voted for?
Here's Noods vote...
Here's what you called her for voting Wiz. Didn't you vote for Wiz? How come she is non-committal and you are not?
...and here's your out.
You are beginning to scare me JPap. Can you clear some of this up for me?
That's what I can't get past as well.
Do you guys think the number of secret council members equaled the number of initial RROs?
I vote to lynch LabRat.
I feel my choice needs no explanation. She claims she has been pro town. I can't find any posts that have been pro town.
LabRat was determined to take Noods into a coin toss. Why? I believe she (they) was greedy and wanted to win this last night. Had we lynched anyone but Noods, she (they) would have won. Of this I'm quite certain. We are in Sudden Death overtime now.
I feel my choice needs no explanation. She claims she has been pro town. I can't find any posts that have been pro town.
LabRat was determined to take Noods into a coin toss. Why? I believe she (they) was greedy and wanted to win this last night. Had we lynched anyone but Noods, she (they) would have won. Of this I'm quite certain. We are in Sudden Death overtime now.
Dawg, I put Jb on there. Obviously I would not put myself on one of the sides because I'm in the process of deciding who is telling the truth.
I was going to switch to Coler but Noods took the easy way out and voted Wiz. A switch would have done nothing unless I was psychic enough to know that someone else would have jumped. Jb wasn't around and the people on Noods showed no indication of switching.
I initially placed my vote on Wiz to start evening up the numbers. I wasn't going to switch any earlier without knowing whether Noods would UD or where her vote would end up. It wasn't about being noncommital at all on my part. Noods could have given us a chance to see Coler's role or just put herself clearly in the lead.
I was going to switch to Coler but Noods took the easy way out and voted Wiz. A switch would have done nothing unless I was psychic enough to know that someone else would have jumped. Jb wasn't around and the people on Noods showed no indication of switching.
I initially placed my vote on Wiz to start evening up the numbers. I wasn't going to switch any earlier without knowing whether Noods would UD or where her vote would end up. It wasn't about being noncommital at all on my part. Noods could have given us a chance to see Coler's role or just put herself clearly in the lead.
