Mafia #67 - 50/50 -- The Play
- Thread starter dirtydawg10
- Start date
JL, why are you so against trying to make sense of FF again? Did you not see what happened last time? We ignored him early and he flew under the radar for the entire game. I'm not saying that is a reason just to suspect him now but it's certainly a reason to read trough his posts.
The people who are hesitant to lynch FF (namely Kash, Ice, JB, and JL) are really concerning me right now. With a near 50/50 I don't see why we are being so conservative on the lynch either.
I think JB asked for me or Lab to pull posts together to support the lynch. I guess I can do that now...
The people who are hesitant to lynch FF (namely Kash, Ice, JB, and JL) are really concerning me right now. With a near 50/50 I don't see why we are being so conservative on the lynch either.
I think JB asked for me or Lab to pull posts together to support the lynch. I guess I can do that now...
Semantics....
I answered the question based on why I'm not voting him. Not that I wouldn't vote him.I just won't vote him today doesn't mean I won't vote him in future days.
johnlarson66
These Pandas Rock
jpap, I think FF played very well last game and played very differently than he is playing now. In that game he was on the communicating evil team. I do not think FF is on a communicating team. I also don't think a communicating team will investigate him.
I think he is playing like the FF of old, now does that mean he is non-communicating mafia? Hard to say, he is playing just like he has when he has been non-communicating mafia and innocent.
Good argument, I vote to lynch lab, again... Well, i need someone to vote and she is the only one with an argument against her, and she voted for me, and its one step closer to me surviving tonight. I also didnt think of an argument against her, that was the only reason for not keeping my vote on lab.
My head hurts...
Well Jpap lets ask this question. Who else is really on the table? Should we all just pile on to 1 player? This isn't being conservative, this is being realistic. Great we have really good odds at getting mafia on Day 1 but if there isn't another suspect how do we know we aren't just getting led around by mafia. The only thing I agree with Kash on is the fact that FF is an easy target to vote out and not look guilty if he turned up innocent.
What about low posters or posters without any real input.? Tank hasn't posted. Wiz hasn't posted anything of substance. Noods has been quiet but seems to not had time for the game so far. JL and Annie at least gave substance posts. Rich hasn't really dove in but usually doesn't. Do they deserve to be ignored? We could also say that any of them would be a good choice for a lynch vote because they seem to be hiding. Less waves means better players to be invested and recruited. If that person ends up being the opposite of your team its a good hit because its out of left field or you can make the case that they haven't been protown in the game by hiding.
Because I don't like low posters or players hiding especially in this format I want to bring attention to them.
Of all the players not posting any substance Wiz stands out the most.
I vote to lynch Wiz.
I have no real suspicions for this vote except that I don't feel that lurking in this format is good for the town and I am hoping it brings out some substance and thought from him.
Of all the players not posting any substance Wiz stands out the most.
I vote to lynch Wiz.
I have no real suspicions for this vote except that I don't feel that lurking in this format is good for the town and I am hoping it brings out some substance and thought from him.
hey guys new guy to site and to game
how am i supposed to play fish friedn you seem to have allott to say got any advice for the new guy?
still realy confused on this whole thing any and all help is greatly appreacated
how am i supposed to play fish friedn you seem to have allott to say got any advice for the new guy?
still realy confused on this whole thing any and all help is greatly appreacated
Here Lab asks if FF is trying to sens signals to a communicating team (scum mainly).
Here FF says that she can't assume he's not already communicating. The investigation part sort of makes sense, but it's FF logic. If he's innocent then he should also hope that the CIs invest him so he can join...it makes even more sense since he claims to not do well when alone.
Here Lab questions the investigation part.
Now FF wants both teams to investigate him, which implies that he is not communicating. Contradicts the whole thing he told Lab about not assuming he's not already on a team, but I think FF was just trying to be confusing.
Asking to be investigated is always a red flag...trying to show off that you have nothing to hide is the opposite of what an innocent should do...you should prove through your posting that you are to be trusted.
Here DD asks FF is he is trying to imply innocence.
OK, I guess this makes sense in terms of FF logic. But again this claim of innocence is rather frightening.
You gave yourself away? Not really. You've been trying to get it out almost from the start that you're a noncomm. innocent.
Here Lab says its only more obvious that he's not on a team.
FF counters, again, saying she cannot assume he isn't already part of a team. I don't see any other way of interpreting this post...and of course, he's already implied that he is noncommunicating otherwise he wouldn't ask to be investigated.
Here Lab asks about the RC.
FF responds saying he is RCing...as a CI
Quickly retracts that, but still insisting that he is innocent. Odd, then, that he has twice questioned Lab for assuming he is not communicating when now he is RCing as a noncommunicating innocent.
Also, Labs post was a one sentence question so what part did you not read? I understand that this is FF, but honestly, her question was direct and didn't need much comprehension. It's hard to believe that FF mistook communicating for noncommunicating but that's not really the point.
Now the confusion starts...I don't buy it.
