Mafia #67 - 50/50 -- The Play

[jbradt]

So you were setup by who then?

I don't think it's impossible but I find it very hard to believe since I have you two as top suspects.

And since we've had so much real, good evidence to fall back on... it's totally unlikely that you're wrong? Is that your argument?

:screwy:

As far as who were involved in the set up, I have to say Labby and yourself are the ones that spring to mind. Hmmm... same ones that set up FF.

(I'm not going to play the semantics game. When I say set up, I mean a false case made against... I'm not talking about intention. Don't give me that "labby was inno. she couldn't have set you up bs).

 

[rich311k]

That's not an answer to the question, sorry. I want to know why you didn't post any of this when you switched votes.

So did you and JB have fun distancing yesterday?

Good point I should have, but I figured it was going to come up in a minute.

Why would I switch like that if I was a mafia, especially a communicating one?

 

[jbradt]

I did explain you just don't want to believe it. I would suggest looking at the rest of the voters. I am not going anywhere.

I told you before I play by feel and I see the world in black and white. I decided to change for the oft posted reason, 3 or 4 times now. That is the explanation.

FF tried to explain to. None of you wanted to listen to him either...

 

[jpappy789]

And since we've had so much real, good evidence to fall back on... it's totally unlikely that you're wrong? Is that your argument?

:screwy:

As far as who were involved in the set up, I have to say Labby and yourself are the ones that spring to mind. Hmmm... same ones that set up FF.

(I'm not going to play the semantics game. When I say set up, I mean a false case made against... I'm not talking about intention. Don't give me that "labby was inno. she couldn't have set you up bs).

I don't doubt the fact I could be wrong. But I'm not going to use that as a reason to waver from what I see being presented as scum. Have I ever been one to take a conservative approach to this game?

Quit falling back on the "no good evidence" excuse. It's getting old.

Good point I should have, but I figured it was going to come up in a minute.

Why would I switch like that if I was a mafia, especially a communicating one?

Let the WFIOM arguments fly...you know what's viewed as scummy Rich. What's the first thing newbs get grilled into their mind from the beginning? VOTE WITH A REASON.

 

[jpappy789]

FF tried to explain to. None of you wanted to listen to him either...

Sorry to burst your ego there Jb, but what was Lab again?

 

[jbradt]

Sorry to burst your ego there Jb, but what was Lab again?

I knew you wouldn't be able to help bringing this up.

I vote to lynch Jpappy.

Just because someone's innocent, doesn't make them infallible. Fact of the matter is, the communicating innocents lost the game for the team last time and are in jeopardy of doing it again if they don't get their heads out of their asses.

People like you, tagging along and helping justify the bs arguments are doing nothing but leading the town astray.

 

[jpappy789]

I knew you wouldn't be able to help bringing this up.

I vote to lynch Jpappy.

Just because someone's innocent, doesn't make them infallible. Fact of the matter is, the communicating innocents lost the game for the team last time and are in jeopardy of doing it again if they don't get their heads out of their asses.

People like you, tagging along and helping justify the bs arguments are doing nothing but leading the town astray.

That was NOT my point.

My point is you can't bring up the fact that me (and Rich) voted off FF without looking in the mirror. This is like the fourth time I have had to say it...its a frickin two way street.

I'm not tagging along and to say that is a lie. I stuck my neck out there just as far as Lab. She was the target though since she started the arguments on FF.

Someone like Annie was tagging along...guess what? He was scum.

 

[Dagamoth]

Not what I was expecting moments before nightfall. I should probably give up even trying to figure this game out.

Lab, I can't imagine why a CI would have lead that charge against FF like that when you're in a position to investigate whomever you want first.

So both teams were mixed on both FF and Lab the two nights... not as I had this pegged. Plus the switches.

Problem is now, Dawg didn't tell us which side got the extra vote that was sitting on Lab Rat with Tank's UD. That could have been an innocent voting LR or a mafia voting LR. Tank died there too, but their role remains hidden so we don't know which team has how many live bodies anymore.

Since it was tie breaker down to coin flip doesn't that mean that the extra vote had to go for someone voting for JB?

 

[Dagamoth]

Why did I switch. I liked the way Jb took his possible lynch, no pleas or silliness. I can not say the same about LR so I switched. Simple as that.

so you switched because they didn't plead their case, aka you didn't vote for who you thought was scummier....

 

[Dangerdoll]

Rich and DD are looking awfully scummy now.

I vote to lynch Rich

Lab is innocent and JB scum, eh? Good thing you voted the complete opposite way without saying a word.

Ok, I can see Rich but why would I be looking scummy???

Rich, you can't weasel you way out of this one. You're well aware that a complete 180 in thought (actually, this would be a 360 concerning your views on Lab) needs reasons.

Kash, according to the rules Tank is still alive. UD's happen when they fail to vote for a second time. And Ice is correct that whoever got the doubled vote was on JB since it tied him with Lab.

Wow, looks like Kash has "skimmed the rules".... completely not a Kash thing...