Ok...not exactly the answer format I was looking for. Just for clarification, you're saying you're serious about not seeing anything else scummy other than Rich referring to 2Hobbies as Al?
Mafia #74...ACville Penitentiary!
- Thread starter Lady G
- Start date
Ok...not exactly the answer format I was looking for. Just for clarification, you're saying you're serious about not seeing anything else scummy other than Rich referring to 2Hobbies as Al?
UN: My vote is on him because of how squirrelly he was acting near nightfall. He seemed to be afraid that his vote on pir would come back to bite him.
Noods: Her list was so fluffy you could sleep on it. It could have been rewritten as "I have no real impression of anyone at all". Post here: http://www.aquariacentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=230161&page=41
The 3rd voter idea is total bunk imo. Is that like the Mafia equivalent of the shooter from the grassy knoll? If you're town you vote for who you think is scum regardless of what others will think of you. If your vote is sincere then you have a "cover story" for the vote and you don't need to come up with any tinfoil at all.
DD: I don't get how she thinks Rich is scum for calling his buddy by name, at first I thought it was a joke, but then when confronted she defended it.
2H: I think there was a great explanation for his flub on day 1. It would have explained his choice of words and cleared him totally. His story was different from this explanation which I will refer to as the "only feasible reason." Therefore I think he's on the scummy side of things.
I still need to look at others still, not that I'm done with these either though.
Noods: Her list was so fluffy you could sleep on it. It could have been rewritten as "I have no real impression of anyone at all". Post here: http://www.aquariacentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=230161&page=41
The 3rd voter idea is total bunk imo. Is that like the Mafia equivalent of the shooter from the grassy knoll? If you're town you vote for who you think is scum regardless of what others will think of you. If your vote is sincere then you have a "cover story" for the vote and you don't need to come up with any tinfoil at all.
DD: I don't get how she thinks Rich is scum for calling his buddy by name, at first I thought it was a joke, but then when confronted she defended it.
2H: I think there was a great explanation for his flub on day 1. It would have explained his choice of words and cleared him totally. His story was different from this explanation which I will refer to as the "only feasible reason." Therefore I think he's on the scummy side of things.
I still need to look at others still, not that I'm done with these either though.
Bally, sorry you are having a crummy trip but obviously you are able to check and keep up with the thread. Any thoughts on the recent events?
Vote count:
UN-(1)- Zaff"681"
2H-(1)-Rich"902"
Noods-(2)-JB"825", Pap"895"
JB-(2)- 2H"840", JM"908"
JM-(4)- Bally"842", Tay"880", Ice"919", User"966"
Rich-(1)- Doll"923"
No votes RB, Chill, Noods
I'm not posting the retraction, because I'm not going to go through all the colors until everyone is happy.
As far as the nightfall switch, well it was talked about in the mafia games and sign up thread, and is posted in these rules. Personally, I think 48 hours after the first night or two is to long and ends up causing problems. Sorry if it is inconvenient to anyone, but thems the rules, and that's how they will stay
UN-(1)- Zaff"681"
2H-(1)-Rich"902"
Noods-(2)-JB"825", Pap"895"
JB-(2)- 2H"840", JM"908"
JM-(4)- Bally"842", Tay"880", Ice"919", User"966"
Rich-(1)- Doll"923"
No votes RB, Chill, Noods
I'm not posting the retraction, because I'm not going to go through all the colors until everyone is happy.
As far as the nightfall switch, well it was talked about in the mafia games and sign up thread, and is posted in these rules. Personally, I think 48 hours after the first night or two is to long and ends up causing problems. Sorry if it is inconvenient to anyone, but thems the rules, and that's how they will stay
