Mafia #77 Game thread- Back to the basics

[Kashta]

Piranha - When you voted Zaffy (post 670), you did not retract your vote on Haydn (post 637). That causes problems. Your later votes may not count.

 

[Ballyhoo]

Piranha - When you voted Zaffy (post 670), you did not retract your vote on Haydn (post 637). That causes problems. Your later votes may not count.

Could it have been intentional?
His vote 'accidently' doesn't count on an accused scum?

 

[user_name]

Piranha - When you voted Zaffy (post 670), you did not retract your vote on Haydn (post 637). That causes problems. Your later votes may not count.

I agree, you need to fix that Pir.

Could it have been intentional?
His vote 'accidently' doesn't count on an accused scum?

I doubt it, I think he just got caught up in the moment and voted without thinking to retract.

 

[jm1212]

right now, im leaning rich.

and Bally, im not seeing the calm and collected Pir you are seeing. he has no case and no reason to investigate Haydn.

 

[TwoHobbies]

Not that you don't have enough other post to make you look bad Piranha, but these two really stick out to me.

He appeared to be the scummiest noob. I was set on investigating Labby, but when I saw that she came out as doctor, I decided to investigate Haydn. He was quiet. And I know that Maverick was quiet, but he's hardly posted, I was really stuck between S4S and Haydn. I now see why S4S would have been a better investigat-ee but it was kind of on a whim, and it worked out. I read LR's confession 4 minutes to nightfall so I made a quick decision.

So your first invest was going to be a vet, but when she came out you couldn't decide on a second so you chose a first time player? I'm not buying it.

There was x amount of vets and 3 noobs. I figured there had to be at least one noob as scum. I didn't wanna make a random guess and find an innnocent, I wanted to catch a scum. I swear it made sense at the time.

If this is true, and like you stated you only had a couple of minutes, why not go with the one that another vet (ICE) suggested?

 

[TwoHobbies]

If everyone votes pir and he shows det we are screwed.

You really think so Wizard? If it was almost anyone else I'd agree, but he claims to have investigated Haydn last night. That was his choice. If that's true how much help has it been. I don't really see him as being much help to the town if he is innocent (and I don't bleieve he is) he has been more help to the scum team.

Either way I say lynch him and be done with him.

 

[TwoHobbies]

Just because I don't know what to believe at this point?

G given your own admitance to helping the scum no matter what team your on, why don't you go against your instincts when an innocent. :silly:

 

[jm1212]

This post adds credibility to pir claim, IMO. If you were not scum you would not want to risk loosing the det D2 after loosing doc D1.

If everyone votes pir and he shows det we are screwed. None of the townies can communicate and the scum can so as to scheme and decide the best way to control lynches.

if he really is the det, he'll be gone anyway since the doctor was hit last night. i have a feeling rich will be the hit though.

 

[TwoHobbies]

And just for one more time here is last nightfalls votes.

Salt- UN 6, Wiz 370, Bally 411, Razz 487, UN 491, DD 529
Dawg- Lab 204
Lab- Ice 231, Jm 236, LG 381, Haydn 382, Kash 387, Pir 390, Rich 511, UN 551
Ice- UN 286, Rich 396, Pir 471, Mav 483, 2H 493, UN 527, Lab 554, Rich 560, Bally 561, UN 564, Razz 569, Kash 576, Zaf 586
Pir- Haydn 301, Dawg 418, Ice 498, Zaf 567, Chill 568, Lab 587
Chill- JB 373
UN- Salt 383, Chill 459
LG- Pir 397
Kash- Zaf 503

Even LR herself realized way to late her theory was flawed, so right before nightfall see moved her vote to PIR, where a dieing Ice already had his vote, and as I recall he said he wouldn't move it.

 

[TwoHobbies]

Whoops..forgot to vote.

I vote to lynch Piranha