Mafia 79:Bio Badlands Game Thread.

I never got to post a "Woohoo - game is on" post.
increasing your post count by lengthing what could of been 1 post into two. :thumbsdown:

Morning all!!

Chill coming in and voting no one without any thoughts about it or anything stands out to me right now. Although I do know he has limited time on the weekends to post, and it was what was being discussed at the time...but the fact he didn't put any thoughts about the idea and just did it is what bugs me.

Sploke...any thoughts?[/QUOTE]

Morning LG!

I have to agree that it did look odd..... I'm going to wait to see if he posts today before I make any quick judgements on his post and get him lynched for not having enough time to post last night, Same goes for sploke too, lets see what he has to say today before anyone gets too lynch happy.

 
ok, its official that I suck at multiquoting. please ignore the crappyness....
 
Then we know who to vote for next nightfall, the scientists won't blatently go out and vote for somebody when the town agrees that they are all not voting. However, one memeber of the team could do it, and then we might be screwed. In that scenario, I made an outcome thing below:

2 scum

We lose two people D1, lose 1 more but kill a scum D2. Then the labworker vials come into play and all hell breaks lose. With only one scum remaining, it will be 6 to 1.

3 scum

We lose two people D1, lose 1 more but kill a scum D2. Then the labworker vials come into play and all hell breaks lose. With two scum remaining, we have very little chance of winning unless the lab worker gets lucky.
That would be great if it would work out that easily UN, the problem is, I doubt it would. I'm sure if the town all agreed to vote no one, the evils would do the same, it doesn't hurt them in anyway if we do that...they would still get to test someone and take one of us out no matter what.
 
That would be great if it would work out that easily UN, the problem is, I doubt it would. I'm sure if the town all agreed to vote no one, the evils would do the same, it doesn't hurt them in anyway if we do that...they would still get to test someone and take one of us out no matter what.

In the scenario where none vote, we would be trying to ease the bleeding from dumb D1 voting, and rely on the lab worker to pick the right vial.(which I've mentioned before)
 
ok, its official that I suck at multiquoting. please ignore the crappyness....
LOL, you must be taking one of the brackets off or something when you do it.
 
LOL, you must be taking one of the brackets off or something when you do it.
I keep bolding or coloring the bracket when I try to multi-quote with colors, it's reeeeaallly getting annoying.... :help2:
 
In the scenario where none vote, we would be trying to ease the bleeding from dumb D1 voting, and rely on the lab worker to pick the right vial.(which I've mentioned before)
I do understand what you are trying to get at...in the end it would be one less gone for day 1.
Although, taking the chance of the Lab worker getting the right vial is pretty slim.
 
I do understand what you are trying to get at...in the end it would be one less gone for day 1.
Although, taking the chance of the Lab worker getting the right vial is pretty slim.

your right, but I'm really just trying to find a way for us to win in the event that nobody is posting. Now that people are posting, it might make better sense to play in the convential way. (Vote people and pray to bala that we are right)
 
In the scenario where none vote, we would be trying to ease the bleeding from dumb D1 voting, and rely on the lab worker to pick the right vial.(which I've mentioned before)

The lab worker does not come into play until day 2 he could cause harm as well as good.

The engineers get an investigation every night.

I do not think sitting and watching is a good plan. We learn nothing and sit here hoping that some else does good.

I think it is a terrible plan and you should know all the rules before suggesting such things.
 
AquariaCentral.com