Mafia 80: Ghost Hunters

Ballyhoo said:
why are you so bent on twisting my words?
It means that even though I was wrong it was still something. If I thought you had come up with nothing I would have said so.
Click to expand...

I didnt twist any words, i just expressed how i read it. But my vote is staying on you tonight unless something blatent happens :rolleyes:
 
noodles62 said:
Wrong, I am voting him because I feel he was distancing from Labby who was the first turn of the game; because he posts just to up his post count and then votes others for not posting enough; when called out for his willy nilly posts, he suddenly has some grasp of the game (sounds like coaching to me) plus he basically got FF lynched by yelling from the roof tops that FF was lying about the T storms, which is what caused the final votes to finish him off; and he was the kill vote on Razz a known innocent....



No, I already noted (see post below) that NP was the one that accused FF os lying and caused that huge rucus that got FF lynched.



ok, so others such as Bally can be voted for "distancing" and you may recall, you all thought JB was distancing from Labby and proceeded to lynch him. So I guess others can be voted for and lynched for distancing but NP is exempt. :confused:
Click to expand...

That is NOT what you said when you placed your vote.

As I stated, if you would read the game thread, FF's posting is what brought the votes neccessary to put him in danger of lynching.

WRONG again Noods. I stated A few times that I thought JB was innocent just misguided about me. Check my suspect lists. Get your facts straight before you come out with false information that just makes you look worse in my book.

Also, I could be wrong, but I don't rtecall you ever questioning NP before voting him. Could you show me where you did that?
 
Haydn24 said:
True. Tonight could go very well, or very bad. How do you know the random event will happen tonight?
Click to expand...

Read my post again, Haydn. It says possible.

What, are you trying to say, that I'm claivoyant now and can forecast a mod's coin flip to decide whether we get a random act or not?

Kashta said:
I'm starting to see signs of cohesion I was hoping we'd find by this stage.

What we have to work with now based on tonight's upcoming events:

1. Town vote with innocents/GHs/Doctor in majority to very few evils.
2. My protection on someone.
3. Dose #2 on someone.
4. Ghost Hunter turn #2.
5. A 50% chance the evils won't gain a new evil turn (as it may kill their target instead).
6. Another possible random act #2 which would have to mean the 2nd majority vote dies instead of the 1st vote getter since the other random act was the one which reversed their hit last night.
7. Ghost hunter investigation/s.
8. Possible ghost hunter seance which gains a "hint" for us.

Hurry back, User Name.
Click to expand...
 
Kashta said:
Read my post again, Haydn. It says possible.

What, are you trying to say, that I'm claivoyant now and can forecast a mod's coin flip to decide whether we get a random act or not?
Click to expand...

Sorry, just misread it.
 
Well im off to take the girlfriend out for a couple of hours. I will be back on later this afternoon (my time), you will probably all be sleeping. Cya.
 
jpappy789 said:
Rich is correct that it doesn't match up well with the protection write up from earlier...I had forgotten that it was an orb, not a mist, that saved Kash. I was thinking both mentioned the mist.

Anyways, the protection also happens before the evil's vials so it wouldn't make much sense for LG to write that they were touched and THEN saved. RAOV happen last so that matches up.

If UN comes on and says that no one else joined the GH(s) that was innocent beforehand then I am going to act under the assumption that the evils targeted a GH, presumably UN, and the random act reversed them back to a GH.
Click to expand...


It makes as much sense as pushed over the bannister and then caught.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom