Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[AC] scoop411;2591502 said:
From what I've seen so far from BH is him leaning me (leaning might not be the strong enough word here) innocent, and then pointing out numerous times how Wing kept trying to get me lynched. (Theres a better word to be used there, I can't really think of it. Wing wasn't pushing too too hard IMO, but BH pointed it out as if he was) I don't like the contradiction between those two posts, IMO it looks like he's subtley trying to make a case against me. By calling me out after Wing's death and wings cases against me, he makes me look like scum. Then he goes and adds in a bunch of "insight" to how I've been playing, and leans me wicked innocent. (Not sure if he said that, but read the post "#997" and you'll see what I mean.

Still rereading, but what I've seen so far solidifies my vote on BH.

This will be engraved on your tombstone.

With as much rereading as you have done, you should know every post by heart.

Any chance you plan to share any of the insights you have gained from "rereading"?

Or should we wait for the movie?
 
[AC] Driver8;2591691 said:
Sorry I have been missing. I am busier than I thought I would be. Not really sure what to think right now. I was pretty convinced that Gun was scum. I need to think about this a bit.

This far into the game and Gun was your only suspect?

No thoughts on anyone else?

No questions for anyone else?
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2591670 said:
Had a very busy day at work today but I won't bore you all with the details. I was expecting to have a lot more catching up to do but not many posts since I last posted. It seems like the people that are posting are at least trying to help the Town. I wonder if the scum think they have this thing wrapped up and are staying more quiet. We shall see. At least re-reading today's posts won't be that bad.

I have to disagree with you there.

Tell me, what about Nar's posts make you think she is trying to help the town?

Wouldn't you expect a bit more from scoop after all the rereading?

And rickets has done a 180 from day 2. Looks more like "oh crap they almost lynched me I need to try to look innocent."
 
Reading through the thread and my own posts today it reads as though I am coming off a little over the top. It has been a long weekend and a longer day. I need to take a break from posting and just study the posts and my notes and see what I can come up with.

As it stands right now Rick is my top suspect.
In no particular order I am not a big fan of
Nar
Scoop
or Driver right now. The List may change after I do some more studying of what has transpired and who was where.
 
back on, trying to use the ancient laptop. I'm too tired now to bother pulling quotes, I know that it's scummy as hell but I';; try and throw sine thoughts out in the morning....
 
Vote Count (thru post 1048)

Driver (2) - O3T 988, BH 1000
BH (2) - nar 979, scoop 1011
RICK (2) - Tree 1032, UhOh 1037

No vote: chup, Driver, mael, Nem, RICK, Tib
 
Just catching up here, needed a 24 hr mafia break after that ridic bad nightfall.

I see that Haggis has finally decided to jump in and make a case on someone. And they're right, Driver really hasn't contributed much, aside from commenting on how "we" need to be digging. Haggis seems to have cleared Scoop in post #997, can't quite follow the reasoning there.

Rickets may have been without internets all weekend, or they may have been laying low since things were going well for the scum team. At this point idk. I haven't seen pro-town posts from Rickets, nor any real digging. I did see some crankiness in their posts, whether that is townie frustration or not, idk either. A lot of theoretical ideas on how to play mafia, with the whole post on "no votes". Not sure how that post helps find scum since it tells us what we already know, no votes suck. The case analyzing the voting patterns on day 1 is the first real digging I've seen Rickets do. Their analysis of the voting events seems wonky to me, as they are making a big case of Nar tying up the vote. At that point it was so early on, a tie had to happen to get HH to surpass Nem in votes. Someone had to tie it up so HH could go ahead to be lynched. So Rickets, maybe you can explain that to me. To me, Nar was on HH early enough that I would doubt scum would have given up on saving HH, so I doubt scum would have moved there at that time.

Now the suggestion that the detective come out if they've found scum is VERY suspicious to me; Rickets even notes that the last big PR, detective, is in BIG danger. The "I see no real downside" statement sets off all sorts of red flags in my mind. I just looked over the rules about the role block and it doesn't say whether Mad will tell us when it's been used, so it may have been used or it may still be in play. We know it wasn't used Night 2 because the Vig hit went through. Could have been used night 1 or night 3, though night 1 seems too early.

This post by Nar directed at Rickets is exactly my thought:
[AC] narwhal;2591620 said:
You want the Det to come out...


And you know the rules...

This struck me as interesting:
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2591670 said:
It seems like the people that are posting are at least trying to help the Town. I wonder if the scum think they have this thing wrapped up and are staying more quiet. We shall see. At least re-reading today's posts won't be that bad.
I must disagree with you Tree. Now is the perfect time for the scum team to put their spin on things, with the townies very frustrated. I know I had to take a 24 hr break because I was so freaking irritated. I'm still a bit irritated. Would be stupid for scum to keep hiding right now, in fact I'd expect them to start posting more and making fake cases on townies to keep things spinning and chaotic.

Ok, this post is getting too long, I've only gotten through #1028.
 
AquariaCentral.com