Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[[AC] scoop411]

Now, lets see some voting patterns...

pulling some quotes

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

We got another one. That was a good job. I am sorry for my absence, I will be back to normal tomorrow evening.

Care to explain your vote at least before we don't see you again for a while?

 

[rich311k]

Care to explain your vote at least before we don't see you again for a while?

Not with that kind of attitude. You were pretty late jumping on the train as well.

 

[[AC] scoop411]

Known innocent in green, known scum in purple. Yes, I am calling Rickets a known innocent since Haggis fought their claim and tried to refute what Rickets said with the block being used night 3. In my mind Rickets is telling the truth after the outcome of this nightfall.

Votes that stick out to me most:

• Driver with the last minute vote drop without any sort of explanation on someone who was the obvious lynch.
• O3T voting the same as known scum
• Those who were not on Haggis

Votes on Haggis that stick out aside from Driver:

• Nar was on early, may not have been able to back out. Need to look at their argument
• Scoop for the same reasoning as Nar

Scoop for the same reasoning as nar? Where the hell did you get that from tib?

And why is RICKETS highlighted as a known innocent?

 

[[AC] scoop411]

The mighty scoop stares this strange newcomer "rich311k" with suspecting eyes. He assumes that this newcomer must be his meds, as the asylum surely doesn't have anyone enrolled by that unlikely name

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Not with that kind of attitude. You were pretty late jumping on the train as well.

Lol, Mr. Grumpypants! I had a feeling Driver was you. I didn't jump on any train. I think maybe you should read the events of the day before pointing fingers...

 

[[AC] RICKETS]

Day 1 votes again

HH (8) - chup 277, wing 310, Tib 320, Nar 323, gold 363, Nem 368, Tree 383, mael 385
Nem (5) - Driver 261, HH 269, Gun 278, BH 292, HI IQ 361
Scoop (2) - wing 168, Doom 196, Star 274
C-note (1) - O3T 192
UhOh (1) - RICK 237
Doom (1) - UhOh 271
Tib (1) - C-note 272
Star (1) - scoop 297
O3T (0) - RICK 186
Gun (0) - **BH 275**
Chup (0) - HI IQ 295
Mael (0) - Nem 236
RICK (0) - HI IQ 322
Nar (0) - mael 240, gold 268

The purple is scum, lime is known innocent, red is retracted, red underline is retracted by a known innocent. ** is a retracted scum vote.

My analysis doesn't look so crazy now does it?

 

[[AC] narwhal]

Not with that kind of attitude. You were pretty late jumping on the train as well.

You realize when Tib changed his/its/her vote, it broke the tie, it was essentially a 2 vote swing.

 

[[AC] Driver8]

I read nothing, I was happy I got here in time. He still has a bad attitude.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Scoop for the same reasoning as nar? Where the hell did you get that from tib?

And why is RICKETS highlighted as a known innocent?

I said your votes stick out to me based on when they were made. I also noted I needed to go back and read both of your arguments against Haggis. If you had bothered to read my post you would not have had to ask that. You also would know why I highlighted Rickets as a known innocent.