Sure sounded like an excuse to me...Not a excuse it was an explanation, and one that doesnt matter anyway since I mixed my days up.
Sure sounded like an excuse to me...Not a excuse it was an explanation, and one that doesnt matter anyway since I mixed my days up.
Had I not said anything about potentially missing a nightfall I'd be questioned if I wasn't there and I'm being questioned for saying I wouldn't be there. If you want to see it as an excuse you will. The question is why do you want it to be?[AC] Star-Crossed;2622513 said:Sure sounded like an excuse to me...
I'd still like to get an answer to my question: IE: why do you feel the need to vote so early when you now know you'll be around for nightfall? Especially to go so far as to say you're feeling confident in your vote with so little to go on from anyone?Had I not said anything about potentially missing a nightfall I'd be questioned if I wasn't there and I'm being questioned for saying I wouldn't be there. If you want to see it as an excuse you will. The question is why do you want it to be?
[AC] gold leader;2622488 said:Of course it bothers me. How could it not? Four townies are dead, including 2 prs and a good player, and the scumbags didn't have to lift a finger. And yes, I also believe that there was no choice but to go by the stated rules. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I have a final tonight, so I won't be around for nightfall so I'm going to place my vote.
I vote to lynch Gold Leader [\B] for being nonchalant about "rules are rules" and calmy watching as 3 people UD'd and turned up innocent b
Had I not said anything about potentially missing a nightfall I'd be questioned if I wasn't there and I'm being questioned for saying I wouldn't be there. If you want to see it as an excuse you will. The question is why do you want it to be?
[AC] Star-Crossed;2622518 said:Ok, this is bugging the heck out of me. Bally is voting for GL for reasons highlighted in red. Did she not read the post GL made that she is using to condemn him? (going to go with him since idk the gender of GL) I took the liberty of highlighting where GL even says 4 innocent UDs. Me thinks Bally didn't even read GL's post, just took an opportunity to jump on him, hoping others would follow. There were 10 minutes between GL's post and Bally's post that followed.
I read "2 PRs and a good player" and chalked it up to 3, I've been a very naughty girl and skimmed :nilly:
Yes I should have. But at the time when I thought I was going to miss nightfall I need to vote. My final is 6:00-9:00 with a 30 minute commute and I was under the impression I had to vote then. Another innocent UD would hurt the town much more than a rushed vote IMO.[AC] Star-Crossed;2622525 said:Yet you were confident in placing a vote on someone's post that you now admit you skimmed? We've lost 4 innocents through UD, there is no room for error, I'd think people would be a little more careful in how they place their votes, especially if they think they won't be around for nightfall.
Yes I should have. But at the time when I thought I was going to miss nightfall I need to vote. My final is 6:00-9:00 with a 30 minute commute and I was under the impression I had to vote then. Another innocent UD would hurt the town much more than a rushed vote IMO.
[AC] gold leader;2622488 said:Of course it bothers me. How could it not? Four townies are dead, including 2 prs and a good player, and the scumbags didn't have to lift a finger. And yes, I also believe that there was no choice but to go by the stated rules. The two are not mutually exclusive.