<snip>
if i wanted to burry a vote i would put it on lg who hasent shown up yet and is likley to ud. <snip>
-I do not believe that mafia turn into zombies.
Thanks for clearing that up. I thought I was losing it.
I never said you believed that mafia turned into zombies. I said (perhaps not clearly) that you insinuated that you did not have the option of taking a zombie hit if you were lynched. Ihe only people that do not have the option of a zombie hit are mafia - which indicates that you are mafia.
I am still on the fence with Tank. his explaination seems confused at best, but willing to watch for now. That being said, I vote to lynch Razz.
[AC] Doomsday998;2643732 said:You're the one making lists, I'm just wondering why. I voted for you because you got a PM that said scum. What say you to that?
FF, there is really no need to beat yourself up about it, it is just a game.
I had a whole long post asking questions and stating observations but to be honest most of them involved FF in some way so I guess I'll just have to wait to see from JB if he is officially out of the game.
[AC] C-note;2643909 said:Voting someone who isn't contributing to the game seems like a thrown vote.
I never said you believed that mafia turned into zombies. I said (perhaps not clearly) that you insinuated that you did not have the option of taking a zombie hit if you were lynched. The only people that do not have the option of a zombie hit are mafia - which indicates that you are mafia.
I am still on the fence with Tank. his explanation seems confused at best, but willing to watch for now. That being said, I vote to lynch Razz.
I do not understand why instead of focusing on the actual logic (or lack thereof) in some of Jm's posts you are focusing on the fact that he listed three people as common players he felt mafia would hide behind. What about the list is scummy?
Maybe it's just semantics but was there anything that didn't involve FF that you would like to comment on?
Hmmm, well it's not a great way to gauge contribution but seeing as DDay had, unless I am mistaken, all of one post less than YOU (at the time of the post) would you consider yourself immune from a lynch vote too since you aren't contributing either? When did contribution amount ever decide when a person is able to get a vote? In fact most votes seem to happen BECAUSE someone is not contributing...