school buses will be soon mandated to have them. Eventually, all forms of public transportation will laso have them. By the nature of the beast, motorcycles are much safer without them. It doesn't take great thought to understand why.
So true...and school buses don't have seatbelts...most are just hopelessly outdated clunkers anyhow. Depressing, really - but I guess if we don't love it we should leave it!![]()
school buses will be soon mandated to have them. Eventually, all forms of public transportation will laso have them. By the nature of the beast, motorcycles are much safer without them. It doesn't take great thought to understand why.
I didn't say motorcycles should have seat belts. My point was that cars are safer than motorcycles, therefore if wearing a seat belt in a car is mandatory on the grounds that it's safer then motorcycles should be not be allowed on the roads. Anything else is not logical. Of course logic has nothing to do with most laws, or so it seems to me.
most school buses do have seatbelts, its just that it is not against the law to not wear them. thats not logical at all.
Agreed. If all behavior is to be regulated according to how it affects society as a whole, then motorcycles should be illegal. Nobody "needs" one and the cost to society far outweighs the benefit to society.You're missing my point. To fly down the highway at 70 mph is dangerous enough when you're in a vehicle. Doing the same on a motorcycle is much more dangerous. So why is it against the law to fly down the highway in a car without wearing seat belts but legal to do so on a motorcycle? Yes, you're more likely so survive a high-speed crash in a car if you're wearing seat belts, especially if you're in the backseat. Your chances of surviving a similar crash on a motorcycle, however, is slim to none. So why is one legal and the other can be ticketed and fined?