Mafia 93: Tank of Terror! Freshwater Version

Zaffy said:
My gut says Lab_rat.

I vote to lynch Lab_rat

Subject to change of course.
Click to expand...

Your gut is suffering from indigestion or something, cuz it's off. Doesn't really make sense that I'd call out GSM for not posting and put him in the spotlight if he were a teammate, does it?
 
Zaffy said:
This strikes me as odd. It makes me feel like you've got some understanding from another source rather than just this thread. First off, I applaud the sportsmanship, however that way you address AAF seems strange for one newbie to another. I feel like the way you said it seems more like it would come from a vet. Again, you analysis of DD feels like it comes from a vets perspective.

It seems to me like you may have some coaching.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure I'd call it vet standards quite yet but definatly not first game play.

What I find odd is that GSM has 17 or so posts total, only 5 since nightfall, and of those 5 the only one that says anything is just a summary of what Lab said. So GSM so you have any original thoughts about DD's game play? Or anyone else's play?
 
I've gotta go run some errands (stupid washer broke right after my move :swear:) so I've gotta put a vote out there. I hope I'll get back to a lot more content. For now, I vote to lynch DD.
 
RazzleFish said:
I'm not sure I'd call it vet standards quite yet but definatly not first game play.

What I find odd is that GSM has 17 or so posts total, only 5 since nightfall, and of those 5 the only one that says anything is just a summary of what Lab said. So GSM so you have any original thoughts about DD's game play? Or anyone else's play?
Click to expand...

I'm not saying I think it's what a vet would say, but I feel like there's a disconnect between what is said, and what a newbie would say.
 
Lab_Rat said:
Reds are the retractions, blues are known innocents.


We know that an innocent was up for the tie and there were no late moves to break the tie. With all that went on prior to nightfall, there were many easy reasons that scum could have used to break the tie and make sure AAF got the lynch and keep UN safe. Therefore, at this point I think it is likely that UN is not scum. I don't see scum taking the chance on a coin flip when it would be easy to save him without drawing any attention to themselves.

Do we know how many scum there are? I don't see any mention of it and in the rules, "Texas cichlids" is plural. That leads me to believe there are likely 4 scum, even though that is greater than the usual 25% scum in a game. Just counting the numbers, that means we have to lynch scum tonight or it's game over. I didn't realize it was that bad until now. Not sure where my vote will fall yet.
Click to expand...
Personally, I wouldn't get to comfortable with that thought..yes it does make it "appear" UN is most likely innocent because no one moved. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if UN is mafia and they didn't move, they would of known AAF was going to show innocent, any moves would of drawn attention (even on day one). Whoever moved would of been looked at for "saving" UN.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom