Mafia 95 - "Mayor's Mansion" (The Play)

LG you've been beating around the bush the whole time and never given me a straight answer. I'm not the only one who notices the problem with your stories...Rb's caught on too.

Lady G said:
Ok Pap...your trying to much and just like with MC, you caught NOTHING. How is that "against" what I said? I thought it was very likely he was, I believed then and now Labby is mafia...if "I didn't want the mafia to think I thought he was the detective...why would I not add something like that?
He voted Doll because of her vote...I seen that yep...it was all he had at the time. As for the theory he invested you, of course your going to jump on that...but I already commented why I don't believe it, as for the UN invest, I also commented on that.

Sorry to disappoint you Pap, but I'm not going on a big distracting back and forth with you, while you twist and conform everything said to fit your "case" trying to make someone look evil.
Click to expand...

Lady G said:
I answered you, if it's not good enough I don't know what to tell you. You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want.
Click to expand...

Lady G said:
LOL, you going to try and drag this on until I fold, the way you did MC.

The answer is there, as I said if you can't accept, I don't know what to tell you. But since you are trying to act like I didn't answer...I added that to draw attention away
Click to expand...

You answered my question with another question, essentially.

To answer that...IT IS COMPLETELY AGAINST WHAT YOU SAID!

Do I still need to spell it out to you?

Your explanation for voting Lab was because you thought she could have told MC to vote her. (I can pull that quote for you if you've already forgot, not to mention you still haven't given me any of these other posts of Lab's when I've asked multiple times for that proof)

Problem is that you also thought at the same time that MC was the detective. (I can pull those quotes too)

MC can't have two roles...he couldn't be scum communicating with Lab AND the det at the same time.

Therefore your vote makes no sense.
 
As a matter of fact when I get back ( I have to run right now) I will be digging in to every one trying to push any of the invest theories from MC. He did not tell us specifically anything. Therefore, any one trying to push that he did is highly suspect in my book.

Watch out scum I am tired of losing innocents and I will find you.
 
Zaffy said:
Here are posts by MC, UN, and me starting about an hour before nightfall.

Possibly a hint at being a PR, nobody really paid any attention though.

In a quote directed at UN, MC says the town will have a better idea of who YOU scum are. So at least an hour before nightfall he's targeting UN.

A response to UN about his vote.

This was a reply to LG but MC quoted it below.

Comment to me.

Going back with UN.

UN going back to MC

Basically a role claim with 1 minute until nightfall



Claim against UN, as night falls.

What bothers me, is if he investigated DD, or Jpap. Why didn't he even mention their names a single time after he starts dropping hints of his role.

I understand that people can't believe he'd invest UN, I find it crazy too. But I can't pretend that I know what MC was thinking when he sent in his PM. Perhaps it was just a hunch or gut call, I looked back and couldn't find anything that would have made me invest UN. He is calling out UN and only UN for an hour straight before night, and his dying words so clearly call UN scum. That is cold hard evidence against a scumbag, everything else is conjecture and what-ifs?
Click to expand...
Zaffy, I do agree it is odd he wouldn't of mentioned anyone else if he had investigated them and I really don't know if he was just trying to get UN to go back and read and maybe switch his vote if he was innocent, or if he had invested him. I just don't know, just like I don't know for sure why he would vote Doll as soon as night was over, but I really doubt as others were trying to say that he did it because he thought she was innocent.
 
Lady G said:
So Pap, as you can see..I wasn't for any of the top three that were in the running. At the time of my vote for Labby Yes I said that, her and her "theory" of how he chose her didn't sit right with me and looked like a evil Labby...adding MC in there, was just a way to make it look like I didn't see that he "may" be detective. Maybe it was not the best way to go about it, but it is what I did.


Well, I know of at least TWO of em you got wrong
Click to expand...

Wow, it took you until now to finally go back and attempt to explain you vote.

Problem is I am not buying it one bit.

You weren't for any of the top 3 so you chose someone you NEVER questioned until your vote actually was placed. Looks exactly like a cop out vote for me...that is part of the issue here.

And you added MC in there to not give away that you thought he was the det? LMAO...so throwing scum on him was a better way of keeping him safe LG?

That has got to be one of the more contrived reasonings I've seen this game.
 
Lady G said:
Zaffy, I do agree it is odd he wouldn't of mentioned anyone else if he had investigated them and I really don't know if he was just trying to get UN to go back and read and maybe switch his vote if he was innocent, or if he had invested him. I just don't know, just like I don't know for sure why he would vote Doll as soon as night was over, but I really doubt as others were trying to say that he did it because he thought she was innocent.
Click to expand...

When has anyone said that?

I've seen people say he could have been trying to hide by voting DD since she was on the block the night before.

That in no way implies he thought she was innocent.

The only one who seems to be thinking that way is UN, but he quoted a question of Dawg's to JB way out of context...and he's more delusional this round than anyone else.
 
user_name said:
when was this connection suggested?
Click to expand...
It must be later. Here's my question.

I read your post. A bunch of times, actually. What I'm asking for is for you to sum up your thoughts on those two players. Because I didn't really get your post entirely. Can you state your thoughts clearly and simply?
 
jpappy789 said:
LG you've been beating around the bush the whole time and never given me a straight answer. I'm not the only one who notices the problem with your stories...Rb's caught on too.







You answered my question with another question, essentially.

To answer that...IT IS COMPLETELY AGAINST WHAT YOU SAID!

Do I still need to spell it out to you?

Your explanation for voting Lab was because you thought she could have told MC to vote her. (I can pull that quote for you if you've already forgot, not to mention you still haven't given me any of these other posts of Lab's when I've asked multiple times for that proof)

Problem is that you also thought at the same time that MC was the detective. (I can pull those quotes too)

MC can't have two roles...he couldn't be scum communicating with Lab AND the det at the same time.

Therefore your vote makes no sense.
Click to expand...
ok
the wizard said:
Such an un LG like post it isn't funny. You may not have the time later to pull posts, but you have time now. Yet there are no posts. You quote some things as "some have said" when I was the only one that said it. Not like you at all G. This post convinces me that you are in the scumden when not on the game thread. You can deny it all you want but until your role is revealed I won't believe you.

Because of that I am more convinced DD is innocent because of your push to look at her right after night fall.
Click to expand...
you really don't know what I have time for and what I don't...so think what you want, if your convinced then your vote should be here too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom