Ok... I can see that. Can you summarize your cases against Labby and Dawg for me? I must have missed it.
Wiz...can you explain this post to me. This one has got me looking a bit closer at you. Do you think MC investigated Chill and that's why his vote fell there?
Labby could of easily thought Doll was toast and wanted to get her vote there early, when others looked at you, it gave a easy out.Right after nightfall Lab jumps right into voting DD, and gets the ball rolling against her. The fat that she compeltely skipped over MC's last post is interesting too. I would think that an innocent would at least mention her reasoning for not finding me suspect.
This post in reference to Labby caught me as really interesting. It seemed to me that Labby and her team having been planning to kill DD, and that they saved a scenario like this for when they got MC. (Who they probobly knew was the detective)
The back and forth between LG and Labby, along with the lone post last night appears to be two team-mates covering their tracks.
I think JB mentioned this earlier, but I also find it scummy that Dawg would narrow it down to only two choices. (Both of who are innocent IMO) This is also scummy, he could be the third member of a team with Labby and LG.
This sounds like what probobly happened IMO. I bet that MC was looking for a nice easy place to harbor a vote, knowing that he could change it as nightfall progressed.
I vote to lynch LG, but will switch to Lab or Dawg if they come up for the lynch.
I wish I knew for sure.
UN said it was to try to save himself but when he voted Chill, Chill was leading the race.
I do find it interesting the way Chill ignored the question at the end of that post when he posted this morning.
I am looking closer at Chill than anywhere ATM.
No wonder the poor guy was exhausted, I don't think he wanted to change his vote..but was tired of the fight, which Pap you are now trying to do to me...dig enough and pull enough quotes and anyone will crumble and look evil...right Pap
I didn't see your answer to this Pap, is it because you accomplished your goal, and it didn't matter to you any more?
Wow, you had your claws in deep trying to twist him didn't ya
What does it speak to you exactly?Ths post speaks volumes. I just don't see how we have this many vocal scum...wonder if folks need to step back and look at what is there vice all the "maybes".
Kinda funny how no ones posts make since once you start in on them isn't it?I'm not pretending to know anyone who's role has not yet been revealed.
So far my focus (for lack of a better term) has been on you, Chill, and wiz. Your theory made no sense from the beginning. I still do not like Wiz's "leaning innocent" list and Chill's vote and subsequent explanation has not made me feel well about him.
Spencer still screwed up big time yesterday so he is up there and I do find the point that NPR (and then Lab) made about UN's vote interesting but he has disappeared too.
MC, this was your theory...not mine. You used your thinking to place a vote that is still official. I, and others, have questioned your thoughts because they do not make sense even though you seems to be modifying them every time you post.
You take people words and make it look like they don't know what they are talking about, when they try to answer..you dig into them more forcing them to try and reword and make their point, going at them over and over until they just give up.LG, it's hard for me to not think you are skimming through and just picking at posts to try and prove some point that I "twisted" MC's posts.
First off, I clearly answered him in post #979. It was only a few posts further down the page so you didn't have to look very far, G.
Second, what about those posts shows any "twisting"? I can pull posts too G, maybe try and analyze them rather than throw words at me...
You did enough to make yourself look evil. Your posts today discredit your vote last night...enough for me to believe you are scum.