Mafia 95 - "Mayor's Mansion" (The Play)

[Lady G]

Well a terrible night yet again, and they took CHILL!!

[YT]bb7TJAyJJ0M[/YT]

Ninja, you claimed I was playing scummy and that Chill was protecting me yet your vote went to UN?

Labby..you just KNEW UN and I were scum...you just KNEW Chill and MC were scum well I see a pattern here, yet you say you see no reason to change your mind on me...looks to me if you are innocent you need to change something.

 

[dirtydawg10]

So you think they were mislead?

With so much discussion about how trying to base anything on MC's invest results was a waste of time you think they were mislead. You don't think that maybe some could have been scum trying to be slick on the town?

Yes...they were mislead by MC's post. You can't see how that could happen? MC's parting words called UN mafia. Not to mention UN's play in and of itself was scummy. I can see how a Townie might vote UN just as I could see why a scum would.

Now maybe you could answer my question...how did a singleton vote help the Town? What were you hoping to learn?

 

[jpappy789]

im pretty sure nightfall is tonight and im not even close to caught up(im on page 135). ill go with who i was going to vote for and then once i get caught up ill change my vote.
i vote to lynch UN

ok so im not done catching up yet(opn page 147), but id like to address why ive been absent and why i went from totally stoked about the game and then falling behind. well first off ive broken my ankle in 2 places(tibula and fibula i guess thats how you spell them) and thats been a pain. then going to school and getting home to 20 pages to read isnt helping much either. this has not been a good game experience for me and im sorry town for not being very helpful. hopefully ill be able to help more this weekend.

darn i didnt have enough time to catch up (on page 153). i feel really bad for my vote on UN. it was based on the last time i was on and i couldnt read fast enough. im really not very confident with my vote at all.

Lots of excuses and talk of not being caught up here, including saying how he is not confident in his vote.

How many posts per page are you set at, AAF?

 

[jbradt]

I had a feeling I didn't get everyone. I can't quite put a finger on Dawg yet, to be honest.


The only votes that can be considered as "piled on" would be AAF, Bally, and NPR. There was a large gap between your initial vote and AAF's.

So if you did in fact see AAF's vote then that would be the only one of the three that was placed before you switched, JB.

Curious how these "piled on" votes affected your vote change if they hadn't happened yet?

It's like I said before, I had a hunch. AAF voted, I had a feeling about how the rest would come out; and I switched. It's really just that simple.

 

[dirtydawg10]

havent caught up. g/oim feeding my bearded dragon and trying to sort out my problems in my 20 gallon long.g/o

Really?

 

[the wizard]

Dawg, I voted my best suspect plain and simple. I don't think you have been trying to help the town as I have seen you do before. Prior to my vote I stated that we needed to start looking into our best players, the ones that can be scum and not post like they are. I was hoping to learn that there is still hope for this town by not taking the easy way and taking out the easy targets.

As I said, those that were lynched posted scummy. They were all innocents. That tells me that we need to break this pattern. Obviously the scum team is comprised of better players than we have been looking at. Not saying that AAF NPR and Bally are exempt from being in the scum den but there is someone in there that can keep others in line.

You are a prime candidate for that someone in my opinion at this point. I have 48 hours to figure more out and either solidify this suspicion or find a better suspect.

But trust me, even while at work I will be thinking on this like a dog worries a bone.

 

[the wizard]

well here are my reasons.
1. MC called him scum then turned DET.
2.The vote switches.
3.The post where he started pointing fingers at me just to get people to look at someone else other then himself.

Did you miss the fact that there was only one invest when this happened?

Did you miss the fact that MC didn't go after UN until just before he got lynched?

You don't suppose that could have been an OMGUS remark do you?

 

[the wizard]

NPR, you knew all along you were going to vote UN yet you waited, and waited, and waited. Were you worried that if you put your vote out there too soon maybe he wouldn't have been lynched?

 

[dirtydawg10]

Dawg, I voted my best suspect plain and simple. I don't think you have been trying to help the town as I have seen you do before. Prior to my vote I stated that we needed to start looking into our best players, the ones that can be scum and not post like they are. I was hoping to learn that there is still hope for this town by not taking the easy way and taking out the easy targets.

As I said, those that were lynched posted scummy. They were all innocents. That tells me that we need to break this pattern. Obviously the scum team is comprised of better players than we have been looking at. Not saying that AAF NPR and Bally are exempt from being in the scum den but there is someone in there that can keep others in line.

You are a prime candidate for that someone in my opinion at this point. I have 48 hours to figure more out and either solidify this suspicion or find a better suspect.

But trust me, even while at work I will be thinking on this like a dog worries a bone.

So you advocate voting for good players that don't look scummy...OK. I've been looking at good players that do look scummy. Such as DD and MC...even though I was wrong about MC...now you are on that list as well. I would put RB on that list as well.

So who voted for UN that fits your criteria? Since those are the ones you suggest looking at.

 

[jpappy789]

It's like I said before, I had a hunch. AAF voted, I had a feeling about how the rest would come out; and I switched. It's really just that simple.

Not really. It doesn't make it any better that I had to ask why you switched.

Most could see NPR and AAF voting there. I didn't think Bally would show up and you said that yourself. Just how many other votes did you think would pile on?

Can you explain what you mean by "the interaction between UN's response/behavior"...nothing about what you were saying to UN before the switch looks at all like someone who was about to jump ship.

You also said this:

Mostly I'm noticing NPR holding back his vote purposely, then AAF jumps in and votes UN. Something felt off. LG is my other top suspect, and I'd be happy to see either her or UN get the lynch. We learn something from either one on the off chance that they come up townie. It seemed somehow coordinated. Add to that that a few seconds later Bally comes in and votes UN, and I'm thinking it was the right move.

If you were still happy with UN getting lynched then a move to LG makes no sense. Not to mention your recent explanation makes it seem like you suddenly moved UN WAY down your scum list when according to this you were ok with him still being up for the lynch.

Come on, Wiz. Nothing in this game is ever that simple. If you really believe that, you are either mafia or your emotions are making you short sighted. You know how you get...

Some parting words before I take off for a few hours