post 314
post 328
I thought it was odd that "AAF" posted about it, I never said I wasn't saying anything about it. In fact, AAF doesn't even mention anything about it when I was suggesting we get the game on already. By the way, I still think it's odd because after all of the back and forth between myself and everyone who was against turning off the silliness is when AAF brings these two posts out. After the issue is dropped... sorta like trying to keep that whole thing going. And yes, I still think it's odd. Vote worthy? I dunno but does make me suspicious.
For you and wiz to see that as contradicting myself is ludicrous.
I don't see me saying that I found it suspicious as jumping AAF for it. I never questioned hi9m about it once. I only said I found it suspicious.
so opportunistic and contradictory, no... sorry, don't see it.
I vote to lynch Spencer because of the whole "did the game start confusion"....
so Jpap leads a pile on FF and you go and vote for me right out of the bull-ring? How about explaining where you've been or giving any kind of reason for choosing me other than saying "something tells you pap is innocent.
I have been on and off to see if there was anything were posting about. I answered any questions directed at me, said who I was suspicious about and just saw nothing else to go with. I didn't question why you were trying to get votes off spence and onto me because it's what you felt..... I answered anything you questioned me about.
trust me, Wiz... if I was in the scum den, I wouldn't need to ask advice before I posted anything. I think we all know that that's not how I play when mafia. When I am mafia, I consider the other scums as a team...... not an instruction booth.
was I satisfied with the way things were going.... you me losing 3 innocents and one being the vigilante? Of course not. Why would you even ask me that or is it that you are trying to put the idea in people's heads using psychology 101...?
like I am trying to get out of it? Explain to me how my explanations was more of me trying to "get out of it". Yes, AAF is still on my top 2 list now and I will still say it's suspicious how late he had his "banter" issues. During the banter, he seemed fine... but whatever. It doesn't sit right with me and that's it. I never went running through the halls screaming AAF IS MAFIA, HE CRIED BANTER!!!!.... come on now, stop making it seem like it was a huge thing I said.... all I said was that I found it suspicious.
:swear:
I stated earlier in the day why I had been suspicious of Spence. To say I voted without conviction is incorrect. When looking at the votes, I was really in between FF or Spence and went with who I thought was more likely mafia. There were still 2 more votes to go when I voted. It ended in a tie because Chill didn't vote in the running. Either Chill wanted the tie or he was afraid he would be suspected either way he went. There were only 2 votes on me so he chose the safe way to keep out of the light, bottom line.
this is not specific to only Rich because it's been mentioned a few times. My thoughts on "quiet would mean a happy mafia", is that this may be exactly what they are depending on us to think. I would think that if Spence is mafia and he was on the line (a tie) with FF, the mafia could afford to sit and say nothing. They had a 50% chance on not losing him. If they did lose him, it's the new guy.... no one would look to what he said as having much girth because he is just a noob. I think that anyone dismissing Spence because they believe the mafia was happy that there were 2 townies on the block is foolish.
without reading anything and to avoid a UD, I am going to lay my vote on LG. I haven't been on the thread at all today so am re4ally going from what I recall yesterday, I will have to take the time to read through things but with a quick skim, it looks like there has been no justification for me not to think she is scum.....
I vote to lynch G, if I can catch up before nightcall and think it's a bad vote... I will try to change it as quickly as I can.... sorry for being unavailable!
I'm in too... I vote to lynch LG
my list would have to be LG, AAF, and RB.I'm going back through this morning since i have some time.
I found this sequence from DD interesting.
These are 2 posts from AAF about the banter day 1,
This is her only mention of spencer on day 1.
AAF is really the only person that DD spent any time questioning day 1, but her vote fell on spencer.
Here, she's called on it by MC. She claims that she explained her suspicions earlier, But really she hadn't, the only time she ever referenced was when she voted him. There are zero posts from her about him, at least in this thread.
She goes on to vote Chill. that night, UN the next night.
Next night vote falls on LG.
Tonight she's voting LG again.
DD, could you do me a favor. I've read every one of your posts this morning. Could you reiterate exactly what your case against LG is? I was completely unable to find it. I had a very hard time finding your case against chill too, something about his reason for voting, you never quoted it, or referenced it outside of your vote post.
What are your current thoughts on AAF?
none of your reasons are very good. just saying. and maybe im more confident bc im starting to get used to the game.my list would have to be LG, AAF, and RB.
G because of a basic gut feel and for everything everyone has noted that I've read
AAF because his attitude and tone just sounds a little more confident than if he was playing as mafia. There is a different kind of demeanor some folks have when they are mafia as opposed to being a townie. Most vets know how to blend this in with their regular play in order to seem the same way each time, I think AAF is a little too green to be able to pull it off.
Rb because although people may have been chosen randomly, I can't help but think that Kash worked it in so that he has a mafia role.