I haven't tried to make something out of nothing as you imply. I made observations and I should why.
It would appear that you were on a mission to railroad Dun. I just don't know where to vote yet.
I don't feel that Bally has done herself any favors. I don't buy her explanations. You said that you see Bally as playing like Bally. As it stands right now my vote will probably fall on one of you two.
I do believe you think you see something Wizard, I do not doubt that at all. As I said earlier (I think to AFF) you have often thought you saw something in my posts and went at it just like you have...but you have (more times then not) been wrong.
All I can tell you about my "railroad" attack toward Dun, I thought he was evil 100% pure evil, his posts did nothing to make me feel better about him...obviously I was wrong and I wish with all my heart I could take it all back, but I can't. I've looked back through our posts SEVERAL times, and I really still can not see where he posted anything that made it look like I was wrong. Obviously I was not the only person who felt this way or he would not of been lynched.
As for Bally, no I don't see where she has done herself any favors either, my point is only that I've seen this happen to her many times when she was innocent. I'm not saying no one should think she is scum, or that I 100% think she is innocent..I just do not know if that points her toward evil, because of it. Have you never seen her post something off, then when questioned get all flustered and start rewording things in the end being lynched and innocent (on several occasions)? Now, that does not in any way mean she can't be or isn't evil. I just prefer to see a bit more from her before making that decision. In this set up it only take one wrong lynch, and it's game over for us with a evil win.
keep in mind, bally and kashta cant both be scum, only one can.
Why is that? Is there not still the Grinch and his/her evil elf...plus add to that we don't know what those cookies did, or who Jack Frost nipped if it was a innocent, that person is now evil so from the way I understand things we have at least 2 evil, with the possibility of 1-2 more depending on the cookies and nip. I am willing to say the cookies were more likely a piece of info...but we do not know.
.
I don't have a gut feel that UN is playing a good game (good as in well played, as in, a vet game more then newb game). That seems apparent from his posting right now. Which means he could be being coached or just playing well. Guess which one I'm worried about.
The gut feel was between 2H, UN, and Dun. That was were I was interested. Any three would have been places to set a vote day 1, but he picked 2H. Without any reason except that it was a gut feel that 2H was scummier then the others.
I never said gut feeling, don't twist my words. You appear to be playing townie just enough to remain hidden. It's something to watch when a vet plays like that, which is all I said. Not yet a reason to place a vote, or even end up on my list.
Because I stopped my reread when I reached my post yesterday morning. It was, checking back, post 434. I think I made myself pretty clear on my thoughts after that point, no need to re-state it that soon.
As far as UN, I agree he has been playing much different this game and if he is innocent, I hope to see more of this play style. I will agree also that it does make me nervous.
FF it has been shown that Pap in fact said he voted 2H because he said Rich was unlynchable...the post was pulled and shown to you...where do you get this "gut feeling"
In your list..no you did not say "gut feeling", in your response to Pap however you said it was a "gut feeling", I twisted nothing.
LG, may I ask, are you defending pappy?
Not defending Pap no, you posted he voted 2H on a gut feeling, when he said in his post that it was because of him stating Rich was unlynchable, so yes I commented on it
